741.41
BVG
CH-NW
CH-NW
Art. 34 Konkordat über die Zentralschweizer BVG- und Stiftungsaufsicht - Austritt
Schlussbestimmungen
Art. 34 Konkordat über die Zentralschweizer BVG- und Stiftungsaufsicht · Austritt
1. Tritt ein Kanton aus dem Konkordat aus, haftet er für die während seiner Mitgliedschaft eingegangenen Verpflichtungen der Anstalt. Ein allfälliger Haftungsanteil errechnet sich auf Grund des Verhältnisses der Anzahl beaufsichtigter Einrichtungen während den vier Jahren vor dem Austritt. Der austretende Kanton hat Anspruch auf das von ihm einbezahlte und bis zum Austritt anteilsmässig nicht konsumierte Dotationskapital. Allfällige weitere Ansprüche regelt der Konkordatsrat.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (42)
SB230506 · zh (Art. 34 Abs. 3 VTS)
State v. Appellant (Fraud Conviction Upheld)
Cited in connection with Art. 96 Abs. 1 lit. b SVG for the previously stated conviction, which was overturned (acquittal in final orders).
SB230507 · zh (Art. 96 Abs. 1 lit. b SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 11 Abs. 1 SVG, Art. 80 Abs. 2 VZV, Art. 33 Abs. 2 lit. a Ziff. 1 VTS, Art. 34 Abs. 3 VTS und Art. 219 Abs. 2 lit. f VTS)
Fraud Conviction Partially Upheld; Certain Traffic Offenses Overturned
The accused was acquitted of driving without a license based on this provision in the final orders.
VWBES.2024.5 · so (Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. b VTS)
Administrative Court Upholds Immediate Withdrawal of Vehicle Registration Due to Missed Mandatory Inspection Following History of Defects.
Cited in the reasoning section to support the argument that changes like installing spacers require a new inspection, justifying the MFK's continued scrutiny.
2023.06.13.sr.2 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. a VTS)
Negligent Homicide in Food Truck Accident
This article is cited in conjunction with Art. 219 Abs. 2 lit. f VTS for the conviction of violating the extraordinary inspection duty, specifically regarding changes to vehicle division.
2023.06.13.sr.2 · bl (Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. b VTS)
Negligent Homicide in Food Truck Accident
This article is cited in conjunction with Art. 219 Abs. 2 lit. f VTS for the conviction of violating the extraordinary inspection duty, specifically regarding changes to vehicle weights.
OG.2020.00025 · gl (Art. 34 Abs. 2 lit. h VTS)
Court Upholds Convictions for Unapproved Trailer Hitch and Misuse of "L" Plate
Cited as part of the legal basis for the offense of driving a non-compliant vehicle.
IV.2017.130 · sg (Art. 34 Abs. 2 VTS)
Vehicle Suspension Modification Height Violation Appeal
This provision defines the requirement to report vehicle modifications and is the substantive legal basis for deeming the vehicle inspection failed due to unapproved technical changes (lowering).
IV.2017.130 · sg (Art. 34 Abs. 2 VTS)
Vehicle Inspection Failure Due to Excessive Lowering
The court confirmed that the vehicle failed the inspection due to non-approved technical modifications (lowering) regulated by this article.
30.2009.242 · ti (art. 34, 140 cpv. 1, 219 cpv. 1 e 2 lett. f OETV)
Motorcyclist's Appeal of Fine for Numerous Traffic Violations Dismissed
These articles from the OETV are cited in the dispositive as they form the basis for the initial penalty upheld by the decision being reviewed.
30.2008.215 · ti (art. 34 OETV)
Appellant v. State Regarding Traffic Infractions and Vehicle Modifications
This article concerning notification of vehicle modifications was cited in the final orders.
30.2008.62 · ti (Art. 34 OETV)
Appellant v. State: Vehicle Modification Fine Appeal
This provision was cited in the section leading to the judgment, concerning the duty to notify modifications to the registration authority.
30.2008.19 · ti (art. 34 OETV)
Vehicle Modification and Safety Violation Appeal
This article was cited in the final procedural citation list governing the final decision, concerning the duty to notify modifications.
30.2007.367 · ti (art. 34 OETV)
Fine Reduction for Traffic Violations Despite Procedural Error
Cited in the reasoning for the decision, this article is listed in the final list of cited provisions for the judgment.
30.2007.253 · ti (art. 34 OETV)
Traffic Violation for Driving Uninspected Modified Vehicle
This provision was cited in the final orders as part of the legal basis for upholding the challenged decision regarding vehicle modifications.
30.2007.99 · ti (Art. 34 OETV)
Fine Upheld for Driving Substantially Modified Vehicle Without Prior Approval
This provision, along with others, was cited in the preamble to the final orders and pertains to the duty to notify vehicle modifications.