741.11
AKVOCC
CH-NW
CH-NW
§ 15 Vollziehungsverordnung zum Einführungsgesetz zum Bundesgesetz über die Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung (Ausgleichskassenverordnung, AKV) - Aufsicht
Besondere Bestimmungen
§ 15 Ausgleichskassenverordnung, AKV · Aufsicht
1. Die Ausgleichskasse erfüllt ihre Aufgaben unter direkter Aufsicht des Bundes.
2. In Verwaltungsangelegenheiten und bei der Erfüllung von Aufgaben, die der Ausgleichskasse gemäss Art. 2 Abs. 2 des Einführungsgesetzes zum Bundesgesetz über die Alters- und Hinterlassenenversicherung übertragen sind, untersteht sie der Aufsicht der Verwaltungskommission, soweit die Aufsicht nicht vom Bund wahrgenommen wird. Vorbehalten bleibt die Oberaufsicht des Landrates beziehungsweise der Aufsichtskommission.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (86)
STKAS.2006.1 · so (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Right of Way Violation Entering Road from Private Forecourt
This provision specifies the duty to stop and potentially use assistance when visibility is poor when entering a main or secondary road, which is cited contextually with the main duty.
STBER.2024.56 · so (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
State v. [Appellant Last Name] (Attempted Homicide and Multiple Offenses)
Cited in conjunction with Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG to establish the conviction for failing to yield the right of way.
SR1 2024 50 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Right-of-Way at Unmarked Intersection
This provision, linked to Art. 36 Abs. 4 SVG, defines the offense for which the appellant was acquitted in the final order.
SK 2024 84 · be (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Driver's Gross Negligence in Right-of-Way Violation Leading to Serious Injury Upheld
Cited in the dispositive as a legal basis for the conviction under Art. 90 Abs. 2 SVG.
VWBES.2023.137 · so (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
License Suspension Upheld for Dangerous U-Turn
Cited as a specific rule regarding yielding right of way when entering from parking areas or similar places.
P/14180/2018 · ge (art. 15 al. 3 OCR)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Negligent Harm Complaint in Traffic Accident
Cited concerning the duty to stop when visibility is poor.
SK1 2018 20 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Traffic Violation Appeal Dismissed
The appellant was found guilty of violating this article in conjunction with Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG in the final order.
STBER.2019.67 · so (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Tram Collision Dashcam Footage Inadmissibility and Traffic Violation Grading
Used as the legal basis in the final order alongside Art. 36 Abs. 4 SVG for failing to yield right of way when leaving the pavement.
STBER.2019.79 · so (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Sun Glare Claim
This provision, concerning yielding right of way when entering from ancillary access points, is cited in the operative part to substantiate the conviction.
2020.03.31.sr.3 · bl (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG (i.V.m. Art. 31 Abs. 1 SVG und Art. 36 Abs. 4 SVG sowie Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV))
Driver's Appeal on Traffic Violations Dismissed
Basis for finding the accused guilty of a simple traffic violation.
SU180007 · zh (Art. 90 Abs. 1 SVG in Verbindung mit Art. 36 Abs. 4 SVG und Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Appellant v. Respondent: Negligent Failure to Yield at Sidewalk Crossing
This provision forms the core legal basis for confirming the conviction of the accused.
2017.11.07.sr.1 · bl (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Traffic Violation: Merging Driver's Fault
This provision is cited in the dispositive, indicating its relevance to the conviction for violation of traffic regulations.
460.17.134 · bl (Art. 15 Abs. 3 VRV)
Traffic Violation Appeal Dismissed
Cited as part of the legal basis for the guilt determination in the confirmation of the lower court's judgment.
IV.2016.128 · sg (Art. 15 Abs. 4 VRV)
Driver License Suspension Upheld for Failing to Yield to Cyclist
This provision was cited as part of the traffic rule violated by the appellant regarding yielding the right of way when entering from parking lots.
IV.2016.128 · sg (Art. 15 Abs. 4 VRV)
Motorist's Failure to Stop Resulting in Cyclist Injury Upheld License Suspension
This provision was cited as one of the traffic rules violated by the appellant regarding yielding right of way when entering from parking lots/radwegs.