832.30
GFMSLFINEMSLFINIMS
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 24 Loi sur le financement des établissements médico-sociaux (LFinEMS), du 28 septembre 2010 - Conditions de travail
8 Santé - Travail - Sécurité sociale - Dommages dus aux éléments - 83 Assistance sociale - 832 Établissements spécialisés - Chapitre 4 Contrats de prestations - Section 2 : Financement
Art. 24 Loi sur le financement des établissements médico-sociaux (LFinEMS), du 28 septembre 2010 · Conditions de travail
1 L'application par les EMS des CCT Santé 21 donne droit à une majoration de tarifs.
2. Le département peut reconnaître des conditions générales de travail émises par des associations professionnelles d'EMS qui, lorsqu'elles sont appliquées par leurs membres, donnent également droit à une majoration de tarifs; cette majoration est inférieure à celle mentionnée à l'alinéa 1.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (6)
C-50/2023 (Art. 24 und 32a VUV)
Construction Company Fails to Overturn Safety Violation Warning
Cited in the dispositive as provisions violated by the appellant, forming part of the basis for the reprimand.
C-4924/2021 (Art. 24 VUV)
Construction Company Fined for Crane Accident Due to Safety Violations
Cited as violated regarding the use of work equipment that does not endanger safety and health.
C-3089/2022 (Art. 24 VUV)
Construction Company Fails to Overturn Safety Warning After Repeated Violations
Requirement for work equipment to not endanger safety and health when used properly, relevant to the grounds for the reprimand.
OGVE.2016.17.15.htm · ow (Art. 24 Abs. 1 VUV)
Reinstatement of Negligent Bodily Harm Proceedings Against Employer
This article was mentioned in relation to the requirement that work equipment used must not endanger the safety and health of employees.
C-2899/2010 (Art. 24 VUV)
KUKA Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Requirement that only work equipment that does not endanger the safety and health of employees may be used.
38.2009.PHC · vd (art. 24 OPA)
Employee Injury Due to Employer Negligence and Insurance Liability Limitation Dispute
The employer was found to have contravened this article by failing to maintain and protect the technical installations properly (the safety device).