312.0
NSGCPN
CH-NE
Art. 74 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 - Entrée en vigueur
3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - Chapitre 3 Dispositions finales
Art. 74 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 · Entrée en vigueur
Le Conseil d'Etat est chargé de pourvoir, s'il y a lieu, après les formalités du référendum, à la promulgation et à l'exécution du présent code, qui entrera en vigueur le 1 er janvier 1942.
Code promulgué par le Conseil d'Etat le 14 février 1941, avec effet au 1 er janvier 1942.
TABLE DES MATIERES
Code pénal neuchâtelois
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (24)
RBOG.1994.Nr.35 · tg (§ 74 Abs. 1 StPO)
Failure to Secure Defendant's Presence at Trial Due to Unresolved Medical and Circumstantial Issues
The court found it necessary to return the case for further investigation of factual circumstances relevant to the conviction.
OG ARGVP 1988 3109 · ar (Art. 74 StPO)
Administrative Appeal Fee Exemption vs. Expert Costs; Traffic Offense Appeal and Refusal to Testify
Cited in the context of dismissing the constitutional appeal regarding the right to refuse testimony in misdemeanor cases.
60.2022.257 · ti (art. 74 segg. CPP)
Appellant v. State: Flight Risk and Prison Placement
Cited in the introductory section, these articles govern the general procedures relevant to the subject matter (execution of sentences).
2020.06.23.sr.1 · bl (Art. 74 Abs. 1 lit. d StPO)
Prosecutor's Disclosure of Investigation Lawful Amidst Public Interest and Media Coverage
This provision served as a justification for public communication in cases of special significance, which was assessed in relation to the non-commencement of proceedings for violating official secrecy.
2020.06.23.sr.1 · bl (Art. 74 Abs. 3 StPO)
Prosecutor's Disclosure of Investigation Lawful Amidst Public Interest and Media Coverage
This provision outlines the limits for public communication, including the presumption of innocence and personal rights, which was considered in the assessment of the non-commencement of proceedings.
470.20.64 · bl (Art. 74 Abs. 1 lit. d StPO)
Public Prosecutor's Press Release on Embezzlement Case Upheld
Cited as a justification for the prosecutor's public communication regarding the case.
470.20.64 · bl (Art. 74 Abs. 3 StPO)
Public Prosecutor's Press Release on Embezzlement Case Upheld
Cited as a limit on public communication, requiring adherence to the presumption of innocence and personality rights.
2016.12.19.sr.2 · bl (Art. 74 Abs. 3 StPO)
Police Press Release Violates Presumption of Innocence
Cited as the basis for the requirement to observe the presumption of innocence and personality rights when informing the public.
AbR.1980.81.Nr.31 · ow (Art. 73 und 74 StPO)
Judicial Officer Approval Validates Detention Despite Lack of Arrest Warrant
Cited to distinguish between arrest and provisional arrest by police or private individuals.
AGVE.2014.93 · ag (Art. 74 Abs. 1 lit. d StPO)
Juvenile Detention Enforcement and Criminal Investigation Closure Review
Referred to as a provision that allows law enforcement agencies to inform the public about ongoing proceedings of particular importance.
SB 2008 18 · gr (Art. 74 Abs. 2 StPO)
Acquittal Following Traffic Fine Appeal: Allocation of Investigation Costs
Cited in the reasoning to define the nature of the competence decision in relation to costs.
SB 2008 18 · gr (Art. 74 Abs. 2 StPO)
State Prosecutor v. Canton: Allocation of Police and Competence Costs in Traffic Offense Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to define the meaning of the competence decision by the Prosecutor's Office.
GE.2005.0233 · vd (Art. 74 al. 1 CPP)
Surety Deposit Restitution Denial Against Compensatory Claim
This article was cited to explain the legal basis under which the deposit was acquired by the state, which was the basis of the initial department decision.
BK 2006 5 · gr (Art. 74 Abs. 2 StPO)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Battery/Bodily Harm Proceedings
Cited as the procedural basis for requesting a competence decision from the Public Prosecutor's Office if the facts suggest a more serious crime requiring a different authority.
BK 2006 5 · gr (Art. 74 Abs. 2 StPO)
Prosecutor's Dismissal of Battery/Bodily Harm Case Reversed Pending Injury Assessment
Mentioned in the reasoning as the basis for the necessary procedural step (obtaining a decision on competence from the Public Prosecutor's Office) if the injury were qualified as battery, although this specific article is not directly cited in the final dispositive orders themselves as the ground for granting the appeal.