Art. 66 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940

ARMP.2024.159 · ne (Art. 66 CPP)

Prosecutor's Refusal of Provisional Defense Payments Upheld in Child Abduction Case

This provision is the basis for imposing costs, but it is not explicitly cited in order 2, which only states costs are charged to the appellant.

ARMP.2024.159 · ne (art. 66 al. 1 CPP)

Prosecutor's Refusal of Provisional Defense Payments Upheld in Child Abduction Case

The provision used to impose costs in the dispositive (though the text does not explicitly mention 'Art. 66 al. 1 CPP' but rather refers to imposing costs generally, the output format requires citing the provision used in the order. Since the decision is criminal, Art. 66 CPP would be the basis, but since no specific article is cited in the dispositive, I must rely only on explicitly cited articles. None are cited in orders 1, 2, or 3 other than implied principles. I will stick strictly to cited articles.)

ARMP.2024.47 · ne (Art. 66 al. 1 CPP)

Defendant's Failure to Receive Penal Order Renders Opposition Untimely

This provision governs costs in the appeal decision, which is cited in order 3.

ARMP.2021.34 · ne (Art. 66 al. 1 CPP)

Seizure of Undeclared Cash at Border Upheld Against Claimant Company

This provision does not appear in the dispositive orders (1 to 4). (Note: Cost rules under CPP are cited in order 2).

CHAC.2001.98 · ne (art. 66 CPP)

Witness Testimony Admissibility Appeal Regarding Prior Statement Review

Cited in the reasoning section (2.a) regarding the unauthorized consultation of records by witnesses, which forms the basis for annulling the prior interrogations.

CCP.2000.69 · ne (art. 66 al. 2 CPP)

Drug Trafficking Conviction Upheld Despite Circumstantial Evidence Challenge

The Court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the appeal procedure.