Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
312.0 NSGCPN CH-NE

Art. 59 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 - Voies de fait commises par un fonctionnaire public

3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - CHAPITRE 2 Dispositions spéciales
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (75 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 59 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 · Voies de fait commises par un fonctionnaire public

[50] Tout agent de la force publique ou de l'administration pénitentiaire qui se sera livré à des voies de fait ou autres mauvais traitements sur une personne dont il avait la garde ou la conduite, sera puni de l’amende, si le fait n'est pas réprimé plus sévèrement par une autre disposition légale.

← Art. 58 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 Principe de la légalité des peines Art. 60 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (38)

ARMP.2024.141 · ne (Art. 59 al. 4 CPP)
Penal Order Signature Irregularity and Judge Recusal in Parking Dispute
This provision was cited by the Trial Court Judge in the reasoning section when concluding that costs should be borne by the applicant in case of rejection of the recusal request, which the final order subsequently applies.
ARMP.2024.21 · ne (Art. 59 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Neighboring Land Dispute and Prosecutor Recusal Appeal
Used to rule on the request for disqualification when the public prosecutor is concerned.
CPEN.2022.87 · ne (art. 59 CPP)
Disturbance and Disobedience Conviction Upheld Despite Challenge to Parking Fine Validity
Cited among the considered provisions, relating to the decision on the challenge of a single judge by the appeal authority.
ARMP.2023.93 · ne (art. 59 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Untimely Recusal Request Based on Prosecutorial Discretion Upheld
This provision was cited to justify the procedural course taken by the appellate authority in deciding the request for recusal against the public prosecutor.
ARMP.2022.141 · ne (art. 59 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Association Recusal Dispute Against Prosecutor and Attorney General
Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the appellate authority to rule on the request for recusal when the Public Ministry is concerned.
ARMP.2022.142 · ne (art. 59 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Defendant's Motion for Prosecutorial Recusal Denied
Cited as the procedural rule governing how the appeal authority rules definitively when the public prosecutor is concerned in a recusal motion.
ARMP.2022.142 · ne (art. 59 al. 3 CPP)
Defendant's Motion for Prosecutorial Recusal Denied
Cited as the procedural rule determining that the concerned magistrate continues to exercise his function until a decision on recusal is rendered.
ARMP.2022.112 · ne (Art. 59 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Defendant's Motions for Recusal of Prosecuting Magistrate Denied in International Custody Dispute
This provision was used by the court to state that when a ground for recusal under Article 56 let. a or f CPP is invoked against the public prosecutor, the appeal authority rules definitively without further evidence.
ARMP.2022.67 · ne (Art. 59 al. 1 let. a CPP)
Appeal Against Public Prosecutor's Office Regarding Denial of Justice and Unjustified Delay in Document Production and Recusal Ruling
Cited regarding the procedural distribution of competence for deciding on the recusal of the deputy commissioner.
ARMP.2022.67 · ne (Art. 59 al. 3 CPP)
Appeal Against Public Prosecutor's Office Regarding Denial of Justice and Unjustified Delay in Document Production and Recusal Ruling
Cited in the reasoning leading to order 3, concerning the possibility for the official concerned by a recusal request to continue performing their duties.
CPEN.2022.1 · ne (Art. 59 al. 1 let. c CPP)
Timeliness and Scope of Recusal Motion Regarding Judge's Familial Ties to Counsel
The Appellate Court uses this provision to assert its jurisdiction to definitively rule on the recusal request concerning a member of the Court.
ARMP.2021.134 · ne (Art. 59 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Denial of Recusal Motion Based on Objective Case Management Decisions
Cited to confirm the procedure for the recourse authority to rule definitively on recusation requests against first instance judges.
ARMP.2021.134 · ne (Art. 59 al. 3 CPP)
Denial of Recusal Motion Based on Objective Case Management Decisions
Cited to confirm that the judge remains in office until the decision on the recusation request is rendered.
CPEN.2020.36 · ne (Art. 59 al. 1 let. c CPP)
Appellant's Recusal Request Denied Based on Draft Judgment Access
This provision was cited to establish the competent authority to rule on the recusal request against members of the appellate court.
CPEN.2020.36 · ne (Art. 59 al. 4 CPP)
Appellant's Recusal Request Denied Based on Draft Judgment Access
This provision was used to order the costs to be borne by the requester following the rejection of the recusal request.