312.0
NSGCPN
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 56 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940
3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - CHAPITRE 2 Dispositions spéciales
Art. 56 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940
[47]
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (63)
ARMP.2025.74 · ne (Art. 56 let. a CPP)
Prosecutor's Inaction on Theft Complaints Subject to Mooted Delay Claim
Cited to analyze the ground for the request to recuse the prosecutor based on personal interest in the case.
ARMP.2025.74 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Prosecutor's Inaction on Theft Complaints Subject to Mooted Delay Claim
Cited to analyze the ground for the request to recuse the prosecutor based on other circumstances suggesting partiality.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited again in the context of determining that the previous penal order itself does not constitute a ground for recusal in the subsequent opposition procedure.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited for the final determination that no objective appearance of partiality exists justifying recusal.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited in the context of evaluating whether the alleged qualification shift indicates a bias against the accused.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited to dismiss the claim that procedural misconduct in another case justifies recusal in this one.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited to refute the argument that rendering a penal order implies an unchangeable stance justifying recusal for the subsequent procedure.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited to reject the claim that differential treatment establishes partiality.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited to reject the claim that sending the notification directly to the lawyer (instead of his counsel) establishes partiality.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
Cited when examining the argument that the prosecutor's previous decision established partiality in the subsequent procedure.
ARMP.2025.64 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Attorney Recusal Denial in Attempted Coercion Case
This provision defines the general ground for mandatory recusal based on circumstances suggesting partiality, which was the subject of the ruling on the recusal request.
ARMP.2025.48 · ne (Art. 56 al. 1 let. b CPP)
Inadmissibility of Appeal and Denial of Recusal in Debt Collection Coercion Case
Cited as the primary legal basis reviewed for the recusal request, even though ultimately deemed inapplicable because the prior civil case did not constitute the 'same cause'.
ARMP.2025.48 · ne (Art. 56 let. f CPP)
Inadmissibility of Appeal and Denial of Recusal in Debt Collection Coercion Case
Cited as the alternative legal basis to examine the recusal request, even though ultimately the request was rejected on the merits.
ARMP.2025.4 · ne (art. 56 let. c CPP)
Magistrate Recusal Based on Shared Parental and Property Ties with Counsel's Associate's Ex-Partner
The court explicitly ordered the recusal based on this provision concerning the relationship with a cohabiting partner (interpreted extensively to include ex-partners).
ARMP.2025.4 · ne (art. 56 let. f CPP)
Magistrate Recusal Based on Shared Parental and Property Ties with Counsel's Associate's Ex-Partner
The court found that the circumstances also justified recusal under the general clause regarding circumstances that could give rise to suspicion of bias.