Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
312.0 NSGCPN CH-NE

Art. 52 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 - Abus de sceau d'une autorité publique

3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - CHAPITRE 2 Dispositions spéciales
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (75 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 52 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 · Abus de sceau d'une autorité publique

[44] Quiconque aura contrefait le sceau d'une autorité publique ou aura fait sciemment usage d'un tel sceau contrefait,

quiconque aura apposé de façon illicite le sceau d'une autorité publique,

sera puni de l'amende, si le fait n'est pas réprimé plus sévèrement par une autre disposition légale.

← Art. 51 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 Principe de la légalité des peines Art. 53 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (15)

STBES.2000.16 · so (§ 52 Abs. 1 StPO.)
Cash Bail Interest Reimbursement Dispute
This provision from the Solothurn Criminal Procedure Code is explicitly cited as the legal basis for the instruction regarding the reimbursement of interest on cash bail.
BES.2022.37 · bs (Art. 52 Abs. 1 StPO)
Extraordinary Prosecutor's Authority to Conduct Interrogation in Different Canton to Ensure Impartiality
This provision was the substantive basis for the decision that the extraordinary prosecutor was entitled to order and carry out procedural actions outside the canton.
60.2008.333 · ti (art. 52 cpv. 3 CPP)
Legal Aid Expert Evaluation Reimbursement Dispute
Cited in the reasoning by referencing the connection to art. 26 cpv. 3 Lag.
AGVE.2004.18 · ag (§ 52 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StPO)
Private Prosecution and Non-Entry Orders
This provision states that a deadline is met if a submission is made within the time limit to an authority, even if it is not the competent authority. This was applied to preserve the criminal complaint deadline.
AGVE.2004.18 · ag (§ 52 Abs. 2 StPO)
Law Enforcement Complaint Does Not Initiate Private Criminal Proceedings
This provision is used in the second numbered order to explain that a criminal complaint filed with an incompetent authority cannot be forwarded ex officio to the competent authority for initiating criminal proceedings.
AGVE.2004.18 · ag (§ 52 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StPO)
Criminal Complaint Statute of Limitations and Non-Entry Order
A criminal or criminal procedure deadline is met by a submission filed with an authority within the deadline, regardless of the authority's jurisdiction.
INC.2001.11103 · ti (art. 52 cpv. 4 CPP)
Prosecutor's Decision Appeal Timeliness
Cited for imposing court costs, anticipated by the state due to the benefit of free legal aid.
INC.2000.63604 · ti (art. 52 cpv. 4 CPP)
Public Prosecutor v. Detainee (Denial of Psychiatric Evaluation)
This procedural article is cited regarding the imposition of costs (justice fee) on the appellant.
AGVE.2000.20 · ag (§ 52 Abs. 1 Satz 2 StPO)
Court Holidays Apply to Compensation Proceedings under § 140 Abs. 3 StPO
This provision is cited as the basis for determining whether court holidays apply to decisions made by law enforcement agencies within the investigation and prosecution process.
AGVE.2000.20 · ag (§ 52 Abs. 1 Satz 2 StPO)
Compensation Procedure Not Exempt from Court Holidays
Used to determine whether court holidays apply to decisions made in the compensation procedure.
INC.2000.38701 · ti (art. 52 cpv. 4 CPP)
Claimant v. State Regarding Cannabis Seizure
Cited in the dispositive reasoning regarding the reservation for state anticipation of costs if legal aid was granted (though the explicit cost order follows in point 2).
AGVE.2000.19 · ag (§ 52 Abs. 1 Satz 2 StPO)
Mileage Service Booklet Entry Not Forgery Proof; Compensation Procedure Subject to Court Holidays
Determines whether decisions of law enforcement agencies fall under the investigation and prosecution procedure, impacting the application of court holidays.
60.2009.449 · ti (art. 52 cpv. 1 e cpv. 2 CPP(vCPP))
Ticino Court Upholds Denial of Pro Bono Aid in Alimony Arrears Case
This provision of the former Cantonal Code of Criminal Procedure was cited as the basis for art. 3 Lag, mentioned among other applicable norms in the introductory list before the final ruling.
INC.2000.38701 · ti (Art. 52 cpv. 4 CPP)
Claimant v. Seizure Order of Cannabis Cultivation
Cited in the final order concerning the advance payment of costs by the State if legal aid is granted.
INC.2000.63604 · ti (art. 52 cpv. 4 CPP)
Claimant v. Public Prosecutor: Denial of Request for Psychiatric Evaluation in Drug Trafficking Case
Cited regarding the charging of justice fees to the unsuccessful appellant.