312.0
NSGCPN
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 5 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940
3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - CHAPITRE PREMIER Dispositions générales
Art. 5 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940
[3]
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (22)
ARMP.2025.74 · ne (Art. 5 al. 1 CPP)
Prosecutor's Inaction on Theft Complaints Subject to Mooted Delay Claim
Cited as a legal guarantee establishing the principle of celerity, relevant to the appeal concerning denial of justice or unjustified delay.
ARMP.2024.167 · ne (art. 5 al. 1 CPP)
Case Regarding Severance of Proceedings in Kidnapping and Custody Dispute
Cited to define and emphasize the principle of expediency (célérité) in criminal procedure.
CPEN.2024.41 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Dangerous Driving Conviction Partially Overturned Due to Unlawful Video Evidence and Denial of Cross-Examination Rights
Cited in the preamble to the dispositive, concerning general principles of criminal procedure applied in the final orders.
ARMP.2024.22 · ne (Art. 5 al. 2 CPP)
Detention Order Reduction for Robbery Suspect with Illegal Stay
Cited as a general principle for the expeditious conduct of proceedings.
ARMP.2023.101 · ne (art. 5 al. 1 CPP)
Review of Inactivity Dismissed Due to Lack of Representation, Costs Assigned to Unauthorized Filer
Cited in the reasoning regarding the guarantee that every person has the right to have their case handled within a reasonable time.
ARMP.2023.75 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Detention Challenged Over Delay in Trial Date
Cited as the provision embodying the principle of expediency (célérité) which the court partially upheld the appeal on.
ARMP.2020.68 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Prosecutor's Suspension of Proceedings Overruled Pending Complainant's Return
The court referenced this article concerning the principle of speed (célérité), which was a key factor in deciding against the suspension of the procedure.
CPEN.2019.42 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Forgery and Breach of Trust in Inheritance Liquidation
This procedural rule concerning the principle of speed was cited in the basis for decision but not explicitly in the final orders, except through its general reference in the preamble.
CPEN.2017.64 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Appellant v. Prosecution: Traffic Offenses, DUI, Sentence Reduction for Delay
Cited in the reasoning for reducing the penalty due to violation of the principle of swiftness (considered in the reformation of the sentence, Order VI.1).
CPEN.2018.86 · ne (art. 5 CPP)
License Withdrawal Notification Validity and Intentional Driving Liability
Cited in the dispositive concerning the right to a decision within a reasonable time, justifying the reduction of the penalty.
CPEN.2017.29 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Slander and Coercion While Imprisoned; Sentence Reduced Due to Judicial Delay
Cited in the introductory section and implicitly addressed in the reasoning (concerning the principle of célérité/celerity, the focus of the appeal).
CPEN.2018.93 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Conviction for Resisting Police, Drug Possession, and Illegal Residence
This article concerning the principle of speediness (célérité) was cited as grounds for reducing the penalty due to notification delays.
CPEN.2016.89 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
State v. [Defendant's Last Name]: Domestic Violence, Coercion, and Confinement Appeal
Cited in the preamble to the decision and relevant to the violation of the principle of celerity addressed in the final orders regarding the reduction of the sentence.
ARMP.2017.138 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Appeal Mootness Due to Timely Judgment Despite Initial Delay in Reasoned Decision
Cited in the reasoning to support the right to a speedy trial, but not explicitly in the final orders.
CPEN.2017.66 · ne (Art. 5 CPP)
Road Traffic Offenses, Violence Against Official, and Sentencing Reduction Due to Procedural Delay
This article concerning the principle of celerity was used to justify the reduction of the sentence (modification of the penalty amount).