312.0
NSGCPN
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 36 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 - Entraves à la liberté des enchères
3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - CHAPITRE 2 Dispositions spéciales
Art. 36 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 · Entraves à la liberté des enchères
[30] Quiconque, dans les enchères publiques mobilières ou immobilières, aura entravé ou troublé la liberté des enchères ou des soumissions, par voies de fait, violence ou menace, soit avant, soit pendant les enchères ou les soumissions, sera puni de l'amende.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (13)
CHAC.2008.39 · ne (Art. 36 al.1 CPP)
Recusal Denial Based on Lack of Objective Evidence of Partiality
This provision was discussed regarding the timing of filing the recusal request.
CCP.2005.9 · ne (art. 36 al.4 [CPP])
Driver v. Pedestrian: Appeal on Negligence Finding and Charge Expansion Denial
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the admissibility of the recusal complaint, but not explicitly in the final orders.
CHAC.2002.117 · ne (Art. 36 CPP)
Recusal Denial Based on Prior Rulings in Same Criminal Case and Separate Civil Matter
Cited in Point 1.a and Point 4.a (via reference to al. 2) as the procedural basis governing the timing and manner of presenting a recusal request.
CHAC.2002.78 · ne (Art. 36 al.1 CPP)
Appeal Regarding Procedural Costs and Recusal in Patent Infringement Case
Cited to establish the requirement for a timely proposal for recusal.
CHAC.2002.34 · ne (art. 36 al. 5 CPP)
Parties' Conditional Recusal Request Deemed Inadmissible Post-Conciliation
Cited to justify the transmission of the recusal request to a different president of the District Court.
CHAC.2002.34 · ne (art. 36 al.3 CPP)
Parties' Conditional Recusal Request Deemed Inadmissible Post-Conciliation
Cited in the reasoning to establish the general jurisdiction of the Chamber of Accusation before the trial opens, contrasting with the finding that the trial opened.
CHAC.2002.34 · ne (art. 36 al.3 a contrario CPP)
Parties' Conditional Recusal Request Deemed Inadmissible Post-Conciliation
Cited as the basis for holding that the Chamber of Accusation is not competent once the trial proceedings have opened.
CHAC.2002.34 · ne (art. 36 al.4 CPP)
Parties' Conditional Recusal Request Deemed Inadmissible Post-Conciliation
Cited as the basis for holding that the Chamber of Accusation is not competent once the trial proceedings have opened.
CHAC.2000.81 · ne (articles 36 al 3, 240 al. 3 CPP)
Driver v. Neuchâtel Judiciary (Recusal Attempt)
Cited in the dispositive to determine the charging of costs to the appellant based on the procedural outcome.
CHAC.2000.37 · ne (art. 36 al.1 CPP)
Motion for Postponement and Disqualification of Judge Dismissed as Untimely and Unfounded
This procedural rule, cited in the reasoning leading to the decision, establishes the requirement that challenges must be proposed 'as soon as' the ground for challenge becomes known, supporting the finding of inadmissibility.
CHAC.2000.37 · ne (art. 36 al.3 CPP)
Motion for Postponement and Disqualification of Judge Dismissed as Untimely and Unfounded
This provision, applicable by reference, sets the condition under which the Chamber of Accusation rules on a challenge to a judge based on case files when the challenge is filed before the opening of the debates.
CHAC.1998.3583 · ne (art. 36 al.3 et 240 al.3 et 4 CPP)
Director's Recusal Motion Denied in Financial Fraud Case
Applied to order the costs of the proceedings before the Chamber of Accusation to be borne by the applicant.
CHAC.1996.3265 · ne (Art. 36 al.3 CPP)
Prosecutorial Disclosure in Subsidy Investigation Upheld
Cited in reasoning regarding the procedure for ruling on contested recusal, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.