Art. 35 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 - Scandale

CHAC.2008.78 · ne (Art. 35 CPP)

Former Court President v. Official Regarding Non-Re-election Statements

Cited in the appellant's reasoning for requesting the annulment of the decision based on procedural guarantees (recusal).

CHAC.2008.39 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch. 3 CPP)

Recusal Denial Based on Lack of Objective Evidence of Partiality

This provision implicitly invokes the grounds for judging the merits of the request for recusal (appearance of partiality).

CCP.2004.51 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch.3 CPP)

Attempted Extortion and Psychiatric Mitigation

Cited in the reasoning concerning the issue of the partiality of the court, which was raised by the appellant.

CHAC.2002.117 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch.2 et 3 CPP)

Recusal Denial Based on Prior Rulings in Same Criminal Case and Separate Civil Matter

Cited in Point 4.a regarding the grounds for recusal based on prior involvement in the same case.

CHAC.2002.117 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch.3 CPP)

Recusal Denial Based on Prior Rulings in Same Criminal Case and Separate Civil Matter

Cited in the reasoning (Point 4.a) to describe the condition for mandatory recusal, which implies its relevance to the decision to reject the recusal request.

CHAC.2002.78 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch.2 et 3 CPP)

Appeal Regarding Procedural Costs and Recusal in Patent Infringement Case

Cited as the legal basis for determining grounds for recusal of judges.

CHAC.2000.37 · ne (art. 35 CPP)

Motion for Postponement and Disqualification of Judge Dismissed as Untimely and Unfounded

The lack of a specific ground for challenge under this article is used to reject the request on its merits (second ground).

CHAC.1999.3626 · ne (art.35 et 155 CPP)

Appeal on Exclusion of Supplementary Evidence and Prolongation of Pretrial Detention

Cited in the reasoning regarding grounds for challenging judges, which supports the argument that credibility is context-dependent.

CHAC.1997.3388 · ne (art. 35 ch.1 al.2 CPP)

Appellate Court Orders Recusal of Expert in Fraud Case Due to Prior Engagement with Bankruptcy Administration

Basis for annulling the decision regarding the designation of the experts because they were previously involved in the case as mandated by the special administrator of the bankruptcy estate.

CHAC.1997.3326 · ne (art.35 al.1 ch.3 in fine CPP)

Defendant's Request for Recusal Denied in Narcotics and Corruption Case

The court implicitly referenced this article as the ground for the request for the judge's recusal, which the court ultimately rejected.

CHAC.1996.3265 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch.3 CPP)

Prosecutorial Disclosure in Subsidy Investigation Upheld

The court considered this provision to rule on the request for recusal, which was declared inadmissible in order 1.

CHAC.1996.3265 · ne (Art. 35 al.1 ch.3 CPP)

Prosecutorial Disclosure in Subsidy Investigation Upheld

Used to declare the motion for recusal inadmissible.

CHAC.1996.3242 · ne (Art. 35 ch.1 al.3 CPP)

Expert Witness Impartiality in Sexual Offense Investigation

Used to reject the appeal because the invoked circumstances did not justify considering the experts biased or lacking independence.