Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
312.0 NSGCPN CH-NE

Art. 28 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 - Détournement d'eaux

3 Droit pénal - Procédure pénale - Exécution - 31 Droit pénal - 312 Droit pénal neuchâtelois - CHAPITRE 2 Dispositions spéciales
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (75 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 28 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 · Détournement d'eaux

[22] Quiconque, sans droit, aura détourné ou modifié un cours d'eau passant sur son fonds ou servant à alimenter une fontaine ou un autre fonds, sera puni de l'amende. Le juge pourra prononcer, aux frais du délinquant, la destruction des ouvrages ayant servi à commettre l'infraction.

← Art. 27 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 Principe de la légalité des peines Art. 29 Code pénal neuchâtelois (CPN), du 20 novembre 1940 →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (52)

AbR.2006.07.Nr.22 · ow (Art. 28 Abs. 1 StPO)
Ski Resort Not Liable for Avalanche Injuries Due to Skiers' Negligence
Cited as the basis for the public prosecutor's office to decide not to proceed if the complaint is obviously unfounded.
BG.2025.47 (art. 28 CPP)
Federal Court Declares Jurisdiction Dispute Inadmissible Due to Untimeliness
This article establishes the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court of Appeals to decide on conflicts of jurisdiction between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation and cantonal penal authorities.
BG.2024.41 (Art. 28 CPP)
Jurisdiction dispute over embezzlement and bribery charges.
This provision governs the Court of Complaints' jurisdiction over disputes concerning material competence between the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2023.31 (Art. 28 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Inadmissible Appeal Lacks Specificity
Cited as the basis for the Federal Criminal Court's jurisdiction over disputes concerning conflicts of competence between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2023.9 (Art. 28 CPP)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Cantonal vs. Federal Authority in Cross-Border Fraud Case
Grants the Complaints Division of the Federal Criminal Court jurisdiction over disputes concerning competence between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2023.18 (Art. 28 CPP)
Federal vs. Provincial Jurisdiction in Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Case
This article grants the Criminal Appeals Chamber of the Federal Criminal Court the jurisdiction to rule on conflicts of competence between the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Confederation and cantonal penal authorities.
BG.2022.41 (Art. 28 CPP)
Jurisdictional Dispute Regarding Executive Powers and Church Leaders
Cited as the general provision granting the Federal Criminal Court jurisdiction over disputes concerning jurisdiction between the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2022.12 (Art. 28 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Upholds Cantonal Jurisdiction in Airplane Accident Investigation
Confère à la Cour des plaintes la compétence pour connaître des litiges relatifs aux conflits de compétence entre le MPC et les autorités cantonales de poursuite pénale.
BG.2021.38 (Art. 28 StPO)
Federal Prosecutor vs. Cantonal Authorities: Competence for Museum Embezzlement
Determines the jurisdiction of the appellate chamber to decide on conflicts of jurisdiction between the Federal Prosecutor's Office and cantonal prosecution authorities.
P/13870/2020 · ge (Art. 28 CPP)
Public Prosecutor Jurisdiction in Aggravated Fraud and Forgery Case Involving Medical Supplies
Cited in the context of procedural rules concerning competence disputes, although the appeal regarding competence was rejected.
BG.2021.12 (art. 28 CPP)
Cantonal Prosecutor v. Federal Prosecutor: Jurisdiction over Assassination of Iranian Diplomat Reclassified as Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity
Used to establish the court's power to hear disputes regarding material competence between the Federal Prosecutor's Office and cantonal criminal prosecution authorities.
BG.2020.22 (Art. 28 CPP)
Jurisdiction dispute over attempted murder and money laundering.
Grants the Federal Criminal Court's Complaints Division jurisdiction over disputes concerning competence between the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2020.8 (Art. 28 StPO)
Federal Court Declines Jurisdiction Over Fraud Case Due to Lack of Zurich Consultation
This provision establishes the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court's Complaints Chamber to decide on jurisdiction conflicts between the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2019.52 (Art. 28 StPO)
Federal Prosecutor Competent to Investigate Financial Restructuring Fraud Linked to Ongoing Case
Determines the jurisdiction of the appellate chamber of the Federal Criminal Court in competency disputes between the Federal Prosecutor's Office and cantonal prosecution authorities.
BG.2019.35 (Art. 28 StPO)
Prosecutor's Request to Merge Cantonal Mismanagement Case Denied
Determines the jurisdiction of the appellate chamber in cases of competence conflicts between federal and cantonal authorities.