150.10
LHGLRESHaftGLResp
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 5 Loi sur la responsabilité des collectivités publiques et de leurs agents (Loi sur la responsabilité) (LResp), du 29 septembre 2020 - Principe
1 État - Peuple - Autorités - 15 Autorités - 150 Dispositions générales - CHAPITRE 2 Responsabilité de la collectivité publique envers les tiers - Section 1 : Responsabilité pour acte illicite
Art. 5 Loi sur la responsabilité des collectivités publiques et de leurs agents (Loi sur la responsabilité) (LResp), du 29 septembre 2020 · Principe
1 La collectivité publique répond du dommage causé sans droit à un tiers par ses agents dans l'exercice de leurs fonctions, sans égard à la faute de ces derniers.
2. Elle ne répond pas des dommages résultant de décisions ou de jugements ayant acquis force de chose jugée.
3. Les décisions et jugements modifiés après recours n'entraînent la responsabilité de la collectivité publique que s'ils sont arbitraires.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (8)
CDP.2009.275 · ne (Art. 5 al. 1 [LResp](http://rsn.ne.ch/ajour_81/dati/f/s/15010.htm))
Student Injury During Self-Refereed Unihockey Match Against State
The general basis for state liability, extensively discussed, although not explicitly cited in order 1.
CDP.2009.194 · ne (art. 5 [LResp](http://rsn.ne.ch/ajour_99/dati/f/s/15010.htm))
Parents v. Public Hospital: Fetal Death and Medical Negligence Claim
The claim was rejected because the conditions for public entity liability for unlawful acts (Article 5 LResp) were not met.
TA.2003.172 · ne (Art. 5 al.1 LResp)
Claimant v. State Regarding Police Report and Dismissal Order on Mobbing Allegations
Cited as a general basis for the State's liability for illicit acts committed by its agents, which was then limited by other provisions.
TA.2003.172 · ne (Art. 5 al.2 LResp)
Claimant v. State Regarding Police Report and Dismissal Order on Mobbing Allegations
The court cited this provision because the damage resulted from a decision (the dismissal order) that had acquired the force of *res judicata*.
TA.2000.165 · ne (art.5 al.2 LResp)
Improper Exclusion from Public Contract and Procurement Liability
The court rejected the Defendant's reliance on this article to deny compensation, implying its potential relevance in the underlying liability debate.
TA.2000.165 · ne (art.5 al.3 LResp)
Improper Exclusion from Public Contract and Procurement Liability
The court refused to apply this article to exclude liability.
TA.2000.309 · ne (Art. 5 al.1 LResp)
Claim for Damages Following Unjustified Narcotic Investigation Rejected
The claim based on illicit action under this article was rejected.
TA.2000.309 · ne (Art. 5 al.2 LResp)
Claim for Damages Following Unjustified Narcotic Investigation Rejected
The defendant's argument for inadmissibility based on this article concerning decisions having acquired force of law was refuted.