120
AGVGVLALIDV
CH-NE
Art. premier Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur l'interdiction de se dissimuler le visage (LALIDV), du 4 novembre 2025 - But
1 État - Peuple - Autorités - 12 Maintien de la tranquillité et de l'ordre public
Art. premier Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur l'interdiction de se dissimuler le visage (LALIDV), du 4 novembre 2025 · But
La présente loi a pour but d’assurer l’application dans le canton de la loi fédérale sur l’interdiction de se dissimuler le visage (LIDV), du 29 septembre 2023.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (9)
A-6797/2013 (Art. 1 BWIS)
Employee Financial Difficulties Do Not Necessarily Constitute Security Risk
Cited as the overarching law governing measures for safeguarding internal security, providing the context for security checks.
A-4910/2013 (Art. 1 BWIS)
Security Clearance Reinstatement Due to Changed Circumstances and Limited Sensitivity of Role
States the purpose of the Federal Act on Measures to Safeguard Internal Security.
A-6563/2011 (Art. 1 Abs. 1 BWIS)
Security Risk Due to Prior Child Pornography Convictions Upheld
Cited as the purpose of the BWIS, which is to secure the democratic and rule-of-law foundations of Switzerland.
A-5123/2011 (Art. 1 BWIS)
Military Police Officer Security Risk Assessment Overturned
Cited to explain the purpose of the law (safeguarding democratic and rule-of-law foundations and protecting freedoms).
A-5123/2011 (Art. 1 des Bundesgesetzes vom 21. März 1997 über Massnahmen zur Wahrung der inneren Sicherheit (BWIS, SR 120))
Military Police Officer Security Risk Assessment Overturned
Cited to explain the purpose of the law (safeguarding democratic and rule-of-law foundations and protecting freedoms).
A-527/2010 (Art. 1 BWIS)
Security Clearance Denied Due to Past Offenses and Lack of Insight
Cited for the purpose of the BWIS to secure democratic and rule-of-law foundations.
810.2007.45 · bl (§ 1 Abs. 2 Verordnung-BL zum BWIS)
Cantonal Regulation on Sports Violence Struck Down Over Judicial Review Jurisdiction
This provision is mentioned in the context of the complaint regarding cooperation between cantons in defining exclusion zones, but the court ultimately finds it does not violate federal law.
JAAC 70.27 (Art. 1 BWIS)
Swiss Citizen Denied Right to be Heard in Security Assessment
This law serves to secure the democratic and constitutional basis of Switzerland and protect the civil liberties of its citizens, indicating the purpose of the security risk assessment.
JAAC 67.101 (Art. 1 BWIS)
Military Member's Security Screening Overturned Due to Disproportionate Risk Assessment
This provision was cited in relation to the purpose of the law, which is to safeguard the democratic and rule-of-law foundations of Switzerland and protect the fundamental rights of its population.