Art. 68 Constitution de la République et Canton de Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), du 24 septembre 2000 - Gouvernement

B.2019.80 · sg (Art. 68 Abs. 3 BV)

School Sports Lesson Allocation Compliance Challenge

Cited in the background to establish the federal constitutional basis for regulating sports education in schools.

B.2019.80 · sg (Art. 68 Abs. 1 BV)

School PE Lesson Schedule Compliance Ruling

Cited when discussing the general federal mandate to promote sports.

B.2019.80 · sg (Art. 68 Abs. 2 BV)

School PE Lesson Schedule Compliance Ruling

Cited when discussing the federal mandate concerning the federal sports school.

B.2019.80 · sg (Art. 68 Abs. 3 BV)

School PE Lesson Schedule Compliance Ruling

The court referred to this constitutional article establishing the federal competence to legislate on sports education, framing the subsequent discussion on the SpoFöV.

C/26840/2017 · ge (Art. 68 Cost. (Costs))

Maintenance Obligation Modification in Divorce Proceedings

Not cited in the dispositive.

SK1 2015 36 · gr (Art. 68 Cost Rule)

Threats and Defamation Appeal: Convictions Upheld, Fraud Acquittal Confirmed, Sentencing Modified

Not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

BEZ.2015.17 · bs (Art. 68 Abs. 1 BV)

Bankruptcy Overturned Due to Debt Settlement and Demonstrated Solvency

This constitutional provision likely grounds the court's power to rule on costs in the appeal proceedings, although it is not explicitly numbered in the final dispositive orders.

SR130015 · zh (Art. 68 Abs. 5 BV)

Revision of Penalty Orders Based on Newly Established Juvenile Status

This is implicitly the basis for the costs ruling in order 5, as the reasoning states costs are borne by the court treasury (Erw. 5).

AC.2008.0130 · vd (Art. 68 al. 1 Cst.)

Fluvial Correction Project Approval and Land Expropriation Challenge

Cited to support the finding that maintaining the Montreux sports field serves a public interest, which was weighed against the private interests of the agricultural landowners.

IV.2011.5 · sg (Art. 68 Abs. 1 lit. a BV)

Appeal Regarding Substantive Review of New Disability Claim After Prior Rejection Based on Change in Factual Basis

This article is not explicitly present in the text provided, therefore it cannot be included.

36.2012.66 · ti (Art. 68 cpv. 1 Lptca (implied by cost ruling))

Appeal Dismissed for Inadmissible Filing and Substantive Deficiencies in Sickness Benefit Claim

This provision governs the allocation of costs (spese), which were placed on the State (spese sono poste a carico dello Stato).

B.2011.20 · sg (Art. 68 BV)

Taxation of Non-Profit Association Compensation and Validity of Flat-Rate Deduction

This provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1, 2, 3).

38.2010.11 · ti (Art. 68 Cost.fed.)

Unemployment Benefit Suspension Upheld for Failure to Document Job Search During Seasonal Employment Gap

This article concerning the right to appeal to the Federal Tribunal was mentioned in Order 3 regarding appeal possibilities, but the actual costs article (Art. 66 LTF/BGG) is usually the one included for costs.

BZ.2007.72 · sg (Art. 68 Abs. 3 BV)

Property Owners v. Contractor (Construction Defects and Expert Evidence)

This provision is cited in the final order as the basis for allocating court costs (Gerichtskosten).

ZB 2007 2 · gr (Art. 68 (Cantonal Cost Provision - Implied))

Architectural Fee Claim Jurisdictional Ruling Upheld

The costs of the appeal proceedings are imposed on the appellant in order 2, corresponding to the application of the cantonal procedural law on costs.