101 V-NBNE

CH-NE

Art. 21 Constitution de la République et Canton de Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), du 24 septembre 2000 - Droit de pétition

1 État - Peuple - Autorités - 10 Constitution et autres actes fondamentaux - Titre II - Chapitre premier Droits fondamentaux

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (113 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 21 Constitution de la République et Canton de Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), du 24 septembre 2000 · Droit de pétition

1 Toute personne a le droit d'adresser une pétition aux autorités et de récolter des signatures à cet effet.

2. Les autorités législatives et les autorités exécutives sont tenues d'examiner les pétitions quant au fond et d'y répondre le plus tôt possible.

← Art. 20 Constitution de la République et Canton de Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), du 24 septembre 2000 La République et Canton de Neuchâtel Art. 22 Constitution de la République et Canton de Neuchâtel (Cst. NE), du 24 septembre 2000 →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (9)

VB.2023.00719 · zh (Art. 21 BV)

Theater Funding Denial Appeal Dismissed

This article was cited in the reasoning but not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive).

VB.2024.00207 · zh (Art. 21 BV)

Theater Operator Funding Appeal Dismissed

This article, concerning fundamental rights, was explicitly cited in the case, although the decision ultimately upheld the administrative act.

7H 15 265 · lu (Art. 21 BV)

Police Fees for Fundamental Rights Event Unlawful

Mentioned as a fundamental right (freedom of arts) whose exercise must not be hindered by excessive police costs, influencing the interpretation of the fee provision.

JAAC 70.83 (Art. 21 Cst.)

Federal Council Upholds Denial of Film Quality Bonus Due to Lack of Clearly Above-Average Artistic Merit

Protects the freedom of art.

34.2005.2 · ti (art. 21 Cost. cant.)

Inadmissibility of Pension Appeal and Debt Enforcement Objection Due to Procedural Non-Compliance and Lack of Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning regarding cantonal constitutional jurisdiction.

34.2004.58 · ti (art. 21 Cost. cant.)

Insurance Institution v. Opposition to Enforcement Order (Jurisdictional Transfer)

Cited in the reasoning immediately preceding the dispositive as part of the basis for transferring the case due to the court's lack of competence.

34.2003.42 · ti (art. 21 Cost. cant.)

Insurance Company's Request for Provisional Lifting of Objection to Pension Premium Enforcement Ruled Inadmissible

Cited in support of the jurisdictional decision to transmit the file to the competent lower court.

34.2003.36 · ti (art. 21 Cost. cant.)

Insurance Company v. Opposition to Enforcement Order (Jurisdictional Dispute)

Cited in conjunction with other procedural rules justifying the transfer of the case due to lack of competence.

34.2003.42 · ti (art. 14 e 16 LALEF; art. 21 Cost. cant., art. 7 LOG)

Jurisdictional Dispute in Debt Collection: Professional Provident Institution vs. Defendant

These articles were cited in the reasoning that leads to the decision regarding the transfer of the case due to lack of competence, although not explicitly in the order itself, the implicit application is recognized through the final dispositive orders (Points 1 and 2 imply a procedural rule of transfer recognized in the reasoning).