935.51
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 5 Loi sur le jeu
9. Économie » 93. Industrie et artisanat » 935. Services » 935.5. Loteries, paris et jeux
Art. 5 Loi sur le jeu
Les contraventions aux dispositions des articles 1er, 2 et 4 seront punies d'une amende de 5 à 200 francs, laquelle sera infligée à l'aubergiste ou à celui qui fournit le local et à chaque joueur.
Les contraventions à l'article 3 seront punies d'une amende de cinq à dix fois le montant de l'émolument à payer.
En cas de récidive, l'amende sera doublée, et la fermeture de l'auberge pourra en outre être prononcée pour un temps déterminé.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (10)
VWBES.2024.260 · so (§ 5 Gesetz über den Rechtsschutz in Verwaltungssachen, VRG, BGS 124.11)
Father v. Child and Adult Protection Authority on Custody Clarification Jurisdiction
This provision was cited as the basis for the Administrative Court to examine its own jurisdiction (and that of the lower court).
V 2024 85 · zg (§ 5 des Einführungsgesetzes zum Bundesgesetz über die Ausländerinnen und Ausländer und zum Asylgesetz (EG AuG, BGS 122.5))
Detention Upheld for Non-Compliant Deportee
Cited in conjunction with other cantonal laws to define the cantonal judicial authority responsible for detention review.
VSBES.2024.140 · so (§ 5 des Gesetzes über die Gerichtsorganisation, GO, BGS 125.12)
Insurance Court Jurisdiction Over Supplementary Sickness Benefits
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the inadmissibility of proceeding before the Justice of the Peace based on this provision.
VWBES.2023.387 · so (§ 5 Abs. 2 lit. c des Gesetzes über das Halten von Hunden (Hundegesetz, BGS 614.71))
Dog Bite Incident and Public Safety Restrictions Appeal
This provision is mentioned in the reasoning to establish the legal basis for the leash and muzzle requirement, although the final order only dismisses the appeal based on the lack of merit/discretion abuse.
VWBES.2022.294 · so (§ 5 der Verordnung über Waldfeststellung und Waldabstand (VWW, BGS 931.72))
Appeal Against Building Extension Refused Due to Woodland Setback Violation
This provision lists specific exceptional grounds for reducing the forest setback, which the court examined and rejected as applicable to the case.
VWKLA.2020.6 · so (§ 5 Abs. 3 der Verordnung zum Gesetz über das Halten von Hunden (Hundeverordnung, HuV; BGS 614.72))
Canton v. Municipality: Collection and Remittance of Dog Identification Fee
Cited in the reasoning but not explicitly used in the final order.
VWBES.2020.5 · so (§§ 5 und 6 des Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG, BGS 124.11))
Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction Over Criminal Cost Waiver Denial
These procedural rules were cited as the legal basis that the Finance Department violated regarding its substantive jurisdiction, leading to the nullity of its decision (though the violation itself, not the application, is the core of the finding, the court cited them in the reasoning leading to the nullity order in order 1).
VWBES.2017.328 · so (Art. 5 Abs. 2 der Solothurnischen Kantonsverfassung, BGS 111.1)
Property Owner v. City: Appeal of Hotel Ventilation Permit Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 3.7) as the general principle of good faith, which informs the court's decision regarding the re-assessment of terrace noise.
VWBES.2016.369 · so (§ 5 des ÖV-Gesetzes BGS 732.1)
Municipality v. Building and Justice Department: Traffic Sign Amendment for Bus Service
Cited in the reasoning regarding the responsibility of BSU and AVT for determining bus lines.
Verwaltung ARGVP 1988 1043 · ar (Art. 5 des Gesetzes über den Fristenlauf (bGS 143.4))
Untimely Appeal Lacking Excusable Delay
The court considered whether the appeal deadline could be reinstated under this provision due to an unavoidable obstacle.