851.1
LARPA
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 29 Loi sur l’aide au recouvrement, l’avance et le versement provisionnel de contributions d’entretien (LARPA)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 85. Aide sociale » 851. Aide au recouvrement, avance et versement provisionnel de contributions d'entretien
Art. 29 Loi sur l’aide au recouvrement, l’avance et le versement provisionnel de contributions d’entretien (LARPA)
1 Le juge donne connaissance du recours au Service de l'action sociale.
2 En règle générale, le juge convoque les parties à une audience.
3 Le juge peut renoncer à l’audience, notamment lorsque le litige ne porte que sur des questions de droit.
← Art. 28 Loi sur l’aide au recouvrement, l’avance et le versement provisionnel de contributions d’entretien (LARPA)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 85. Aide sociale » 851. Aide au recouvrement, avance et versement provisionnel de contributions d'entretien
Art. 30 Loi sur l’aide au recouvrement, l’avance et le versement provisionnel de contributions d’entretien (LARPA) →
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (6)
VWBES.2020.74 · so (Art. 28, Art. 29 bis 34 ZUG)
Appeal Against Refusal of Subsidiary Cost Guarantee Lacking Current Interest
Cited in the reasoning as the relevant articles governing inter-cantonal procedures for social assistance disputes.
WBE.2016.346 · ag (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Social Assistance: Inter-Cantonal Jurisdiction and Cantonal Social Services' Responsibility
Cited as the basis for intercantonal communication occurring through competent cantonal authorities.
AGVE.2016.39 · ag (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Municipality Denied Authority Over Inter-Cantonal Social Assistance Responsibility
This provision states that communication between cantons regarding social assistance is handled by the competent cantonal official bodies, which was key to determining the correct procedure for the intercantonal jurisdiction conflict.
AGVE.2016.39 · ag (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Social Assistance: Canton Competence Dispute Resolution
Governs inter-cantonal communication through designated cantonal authorities and is cited in the context of clarifying responsibilities in negative competence conflicts.
B.2004.63 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Intercantonal Cost Responsibility for Institutional Care vs. Municipal Authority
The court affirmed the lower instance's finding that jurisdiction lies with cantonal authorities in inter-cantonal matters under the ZUG, as this provision regulates communication between cantons.
B.2004.63 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)
Intercantonal Cost-Sharing Dispute Between Municipalities Regarding Institutional Care
Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that intercantonal contact must occur via cantonal authorities, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on procedural grounds regarding municipal authority.