Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
836.1 EFLZGLILAFAM CH-JU

Art. 22 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les allocations familiales (LiLAFam)

8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 83. Assurances sociales » 836. Allocations familiales
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (29 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 22 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les allocations familiales (LiLAFam)

1 Il est institué une commission consultative en matière d’allocations familiales.

2 La commission consultative est composée de sept membres nommés par le Gouvernement pour la législature.

3 Les employeurs, comprenant des représentants des caisses de compensation pour allocations familiales, et les salariés y sont équitablement représentés.

4 Le gérant de la Caisse d’allocations familiales du canton du Jura préside la commission consultative.

5 La commission est consultée sur les questions liées à l'application de la présente législation.

← Art. 21 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les allocations familiales (LiLAFam) 8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 83. Assurances sociales » 836. Allocations familiales Art. 23 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les allocations familiales (LiLAFam) →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)

39.2017.1 · ti (art. 22 Reg. Laf)
Spouse's Apprenticeship Income Calculation Upheld in Family Allowance Dispute
The court's confirmation of the decision relies on the interpretation of Art. 22 Reg. Laf concerning the exemption for 'prima formazione'.
39.2007.6 · ti (Art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Appeal Regarding Denied Family Allowances for Unenrolled Dependent Child
Cited to explain the maximum duration of the training allowance under new rules, contextual information.
39.2006.6 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Appeal Regarding Termination of Family Allowances After Child Reached Age Twenty
This provision is cited as the basis for confirming that the right to the allowance ceases at the latest at the end of the month in which the child turns twenty, justifying the rejection of the appeal.
39.2003.14 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Step-Parent Family Allowance Benefits After Legislative Change
Cited in the reasoning to check the age limit for granting the training allowance, which must be verified upon referral.
39.2000.91 · ti (Art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Family Allowances Time-Barred
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the end date for the training allowance based on the child reaching the age limit.
39.2000.91 · ti (Art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Claimant Denied Retroactive Family Allowances Under New Law and Time-Barred Claim
Cited in the reasoning section to confirm the correct denial of benefits for one child due to reaching the age limit.
39.2006.6 · ti (Art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Boy-20 Age Limit vs. Apprentice Status for Family Allowance Termination
This provision sets the maximum duration for educational allowances until the end of the month the child turns twenty, which was the legal basis for upholding the cessation of benefits.
39.2007.6 · ti (Art. 22 cpv. 3 LAF)
Family Allowance Denial Over Temporary Training Interruption
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding changes to the law that occurred after the relevant period, not used in the final order.
39.2016.9 · ti (Art. 22 Reg. Laf)
Family Benefits Reduction Based on Hypothetical Income Calculation
Cited in the reasoning regarding justifications that previously allowed for the non-computation of hypothetical income (incapacity for work, and in the new regulation concerning first training).
39.2016.9 · ti (art. 22 Reg. Laf)
Family Benefits Reduction Based on Hypothetical Income Calculation
Cited in the reasoning (point 2.3) regarding the previous justification for not calculating imputed income, and also later in the reasoning regarding new rules.
39.2016.9 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 Reg. Laf)
Family Benefits Reduction Based on Hypothetical Income Calculation
Cited in the reasoning when discussing causes for non-computation of imputed income under the old law (incapacity for work).