832.10
EGKVGLILAMAL
CH-JU
Art. 9 Loi portant introduction de la loi fédérale sur l’assurance-maladie (LiLAMal)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 83. Assurances sociales » 832. Assurance en cas de maladie et d'accidents
Art. 9 Loi portant introduction de la loi fédérale sur l’assurance-maladie (LiLAMal)
Le Service de la santé publique est compétent pour procéder aux examens, selon l'article 21, alinéa 3, LAMal, lorsque ces tâches sont confiées au Canton.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (10)
VVGE.2009.10.Nr.35 · ow (Art. 9 V EG KVG)
Premium Subsidy Application Deadline and Legitimate Expectations
The applicant's claims for premium subsidies are forfeited because she failed to apply for a subsidy form and make her claims within the deadline.
KV.2017.00116 · zh (Art. 9 KVG)
Health Insurer Premium Collection Appeal Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning (E. 3.2) regarding the duty to inform, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-3), thus it is excluded.
AM.22.18.29.2018 · vd (Art. 9 LAMal)
Insured Denied Reimbursement for Accident Risk Premiums Due to Prior Knowledge of Coverage Options
This provision concerns the insurer's duty to inform the insured about the possibility of suspension, which is central to the dispute, although it is used in the reasoning rather than the final dispositive orders.
2014.11.05.sv.3 · bl (§ 9 Abs. 1 EG KVG)
Premium Subsidies: 2012 Income Basis for 2014 Eligibility
Cited as the basis for using the intermediate total of taxable income from the 2012 tax assessment as the decisive income for calculating the premium subsidy for 2014.
740.14.125 · bl (§ 9 Abs. 1 EG KVG)
Premium Subsidies: 2012 Interim Income Calculation Validated
This provision is used to determine the relevant income for the assessment of premium subsidies, specifically referring to the interim total of taxable income from the tax assessment of the year before the previous year.
2014.08.13.sv.2 · bl (§ 9 Abs. 1 EG KVG)
Health Insurance Premium Subsidy Denial Upheld
Used to determine the calculation of the relevant annual income for the premium subsidy.
B.2004.36 · sg (Art. 9 Abs. 1 VO zum EG zum KVG (sGS 331.111))
Health Insurance Premiums: Mid-Year Family Change vs. January 1st Status
This provision, establishing that personal and family circumstances on January 1st are decisive, is implicitly upheld by the final order confirming the initial decision based on those fixed circumstances.
B.2004.36 · sg (Art. 9 Abs. 1 VO zum EG zum KVG (sGS 331.111))
Cantonal Premium Subsidy Date vs. Federal Current Income Requirement
This cantonal provision, establishing the reference date of January 1st for entitlement, was ultimately found to be compliant with federal law, justifying the confirmation of the initial decision.
TVR.2003.Nr.32 · tg (§ 9 Abs. 2 TG KVG)
Insured Obligation to Apply for Premium Reduction
Cited in the final order (point 2) as the provision establishing that the right to premium reduction expires at the end of the year for which it is granted.
36.1999.181 · ti (art. 9 cpv. 2 LAMal)
Insured Wins Dispute Over Health Insurance Premium Payment Responsibility Based on Modification Form Notation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the justification for charging default interest, although the final order only addresses costs and overturning the previous decision.