Art. 8 Loi portant introduction de la loi fédérale sur l’assurance-maladie (LiLAMal)

608 2023 62 · fr (art. 8 al. 1 1ère phrase LAMal)

Student Knee Injury Insurance Classification Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Cited in the reasoning concerning the suspension of accident coverage when mandatory accident insurance (LAA) applies.

608 2023 62 · fr (art. 8 al. 2 LAMal)

Student Knee Injury Insurance Classification Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Cited in the reasoning regarding when accident coverage under LAMal begins if LAA coverage ceases.

IV.2020.128 · sg (Art. 8 KVG)

Disability Insurance Coverage for Femoral Epiphysiolysis Treatment Based on IVG Coordination Rules

This provision is mentioned in the header but is not cited in the dispositive orders; instead, its relevance was discussed in the context of Art. 64 Abs. 2 ATSG during the reasoning.

IV.2020.128 · sg (Art. 8 KVG)

Disability Insurance vs. Health Insurance Liability for Pre-Vocational Medical Measures

Mentioned in the reasoning as the legal basis for the appellant's coverage when the accident definition under UVG is not met, supporting the application of Art. 64 Abs. 2 ATSG.

2020.11.19.sv.1 · bl (Art. 8 Abs. 1 KVG)

Insured Liable for Premiums Despite Lack of Knowledge of Policy Changes

Cited in relation to suspending accident coverage when the insured is covered by UVG.

730.20.110.283 · bl (Art. 8 Abs. 1 KVG)

Social Service Office Policy Changes Approved by Tacit Consent

Cited in relation to the suspension of coverage for accidents by social health insurance and the corresponding premium reduction upon proof of UVG coverage.

730.20.110.283 · bl (Art. 8 Abs. 2 KVG)

Social Service Office Policy Changes Approved by Tacit Consent

Cited stating that accidents are covered by KVG once UVG coverage ceases in whole or in part.

UV.2018.00272 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. 3 KVG)

Insured Dental Coverage Appeal Over Pre-existing Condition Dispute

Cited in the reasoning regarding the obligation to include the current health insurer in the proceedings upon remand.

2019.07.12.sv.1 · bl (§ 8 Abs. 1bis EG KVG)

Health Insurance Subsidies Denied Based on Father's Income

This provision states that young adults do not have a claim for premium reduction if their parents live in favorable economic circumstances and receive a training allowance.

KV.2017.00116 · zh (Art. 8 KVG in Verbindung mit Art. 11 der Verordnung über die Krankenversicherung (KVV))

Health Insurer Premium Collection Appeal Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning (E. 3.2) regarding the suspension of accident insurance, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-3), thus it is excluded.

AM.22.18.29.2018 · vd (Art. 8 al. 1 LAMal)

Insured Denied Reimbursement for Accident Risk Premiums Due to Prior Knowledge of Coverage Options

This provision concerns the possibility of suspending accident coverage, which is central to the dispute, although it is used in the reasoning rather than the final dispositive orders.

A/5083/2017 · ge (art. 8 LAMal)

Retired Insured vs. Mandatory Health Insurer Regarding Accident Coverage Reinstatement

The core issue concerning the suspension of accident coverage is analyzed under this article, leading to the rejection of the appeal.

740.16.190.125 · bl (§ 8 Abs. 1bis EG KVG)

Adjustment of Income Ceilings for Premium Subsidies Based on Parental Support of Adult Students

Cited to explain the conditions under which young adults no longer have an independent claim to premium subsidies if their parents are in favorable economic circumstances and receive family allowances.

605 2013 102 · fr (Art. 8 al. 1 et 2 LAMal)

Employee Accident Coverage Dispute: LAA vs. LAMal Precedence

Cited to explain the subsidiarity of the LAMal accident supplement in relation to mandatory LAA coverage.

36.2006.195 · ti (art. 8 cpv. 1 LAMal)

Insured's Appeal for Retroactive Health Premium Reimbursement Denied Due to Lack of Proof and Statute of Limitations

Cited in the reasoning to establish the legal requirement for suspending accident insurance premiums, which was a central issue in rejecting the appeal regarding the retroactive period.