831.30
ELIGLILPC
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 5 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les prestations complémentaires à l'assurance-vieillesse, survivants et invalidité (LiLPC)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 83. Assurances sociales » 831. Assurance-vieillesse et survivants, assurance-invalidité
Art. 5 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les prestations complémentaires à l'assurance-vieillesse, survivants et invalidité (LiLPC)
1 La Caisse de compensation du canton du Jura est chargée de l'application de la présente loi au sens de l'article 63, alinéa 4, de la loi fédérale du 20 décembre 1946 sur l'assurance-vieillesse et survivants.
2 Les dispositions de la loi portant introduction de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-vieillesse et survivants relatives à la responsabilité et à l'obligation de renseigner sont applicables par analogie.
3 La Caisse de compensation établit des comptes séparés pour les versements des prestations complémentaires et pour les frais d'administration; il lui incombe de demander la participation fédérale et de procéder au décompte à la fin de chaque année comptable.
4 Le Département des Finances fait les avances de fonds nécessaires à la Caisse de compensation en vue du versement des prestations complémentaires et de la couverture des frais d'administration; il encaisse la participation de la Confédération et des communes (art. 11).
← Art. 4 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les prestations complémentaires à l'assurance-vieillesse, survivants et invalidité (LiLPC)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 83. Assurances sociales » 831. Assurance-vieillesse et survivants, assurance-invalidité
Art. 6 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les prestations complémentaires à l'assurance-vieillesse, survivants et invalidité (LiLPC) →
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (214)
63/2012/9 · sh (Art. 5 Abs. 1 ELG/SH)
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Administration (Heroin-Assisted Treatment Fee)
The court uses Art. 5 para. 1 ELG/SH concerning the cantonal regulation of reimbursable costs.
VSBES.1999.525 · so (Art. 5 lit. b ELG)
Recipient v. Social Insurance Agency (Housing Cost Apportionment for Minor Child)
The decision relies on this article concerning the maximum recognized annual rent for the calculation of supplementary benefits.
200 2025 283 · be (Art. 5 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ELG)
Foreign National's Appeal of Denied Supplementary Benefits Based on Retroactive Social Security Agreement
This provision establishes the standard ten-year residency requirement (Karenzfrist) which the court confirmed was applicable.
EL.2025.11 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 ELG)
Deportee's Appeal for Supplementary Benefits Denied Due to Lack of Lawful Residence
The appeal was dismissed because the main prerequisite for receiving supplementary benefits (legal residence in Switzerland) was not met for the foreign claimant.
200 2025 229 · be (Art. 5 Abs. 1 ELG)
Foreign National Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Interrupted Residency Requirement
The decision hinges on the applicant failing to meet the ten-year continuous residence requirement (Karenzfrist) for foreigners under this article.
EL.2025.3 · sg (Art. 5 Abs. 1 ELG)
Applicant v. Benefits Administration: Residency Requirement Appeal
The court found that the appellant fulfilled the necessary ten-year continuous residence requirement (Karenzfrist) for EL entitlement, which is governed by this article.
VSBES.2023.25 · so (Art. 5 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3 ELG)
Social Insurance Fund Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Ten-Year Residency Requirement
The main substantive provision used to justify the dismissal of the appeal because the ten-year continuous lawful residence requirement (waiting period) was not met.
33.2024.18 · ti (art. 5 cpv. 1 LPC)
Claimant v. Denial of Supplementary Benefits for Unauthorized Residence
The rejection of the appeal is based on the finding that the appellant did not reside legally in Switzerland at the time the supplementary benefits were suppressed.
ZL.2024.00063 · zh (Art. 5 Abs. 5 ELG)
Foreign National Benefits Cessation and Requalification Appeal
Mentioned in the reasoning to discuss the consequence of a stay abroad exceeding three months on the waiting period.
ZL.2024.00063 · zh (Art. 5 ELG)
Foreign National Benefits Cessation and Requalification Appeal
The ruling partially accepts the appeal by clarifying that the claimant does not have to fulfill the residence requirement (waiting period) anew upon return.
A/876/2024 · ge (Art. 5 al. 1 LPC)
Tolerated Presence Insufficient for Complementary Social Benefits Eligibility
The court rejected the appeal based on the finding that the appellant did not legally reside in Switzerland, which is a condition for receiving supplementary benefits (PC).
A/4137/2023 · ge (art. 5 al. 1 LPC)
Disability Pension Recipient Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Invalid Residence Permit
The appeal was rejected because the appellant did not reside legally in Switzerland during the ten years preceding the application, as required by this provision.
A/3795/2023 · ge (art. 5 al. 1 LPC)
Claimant v. Denial of Supplementary Benefits Due to Insufficient Legal Residency
This article establishes the ten-year legal residency requirement for foreign nationals not from the EU/EFTA to receive complementary federal benefits, which was the core subject of the refusal.
A/388/2023 · ge (art. 5 al. 1 LPC)
Appeal Regarding Interrupted Legal Residency for Complementary Benefits
The court determined that the condition regarding uninterrupted legal residence for ten years was met, implicitly using this article as the substantive ground for allowing the appeal in part.
ZL.2023.00088 · zh (Art. 5 Abs. 3 lit. d ELG)
C-Permit Holder Denied Supplementary Benefits Due to Extended Absence Exceeding Permissible Limit
This article establishing the 10-year residency requirement for foreigners receiving supplementary benefits was the legal basis for dismissing the appeal because the requirement was not met.