Art. 15 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les prestations complémentaires à l'assurance-vieillesse, survivants et invalidité (LiLPC)

ZL.2024.00005 · zh (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. a ELG)

Reimbursement of Transportation Costs for Medical Treatments Denied Due to Failure to Address All Claims

Cited to establish the 15-month deadline for claiming reimbursement of sickness and disability costs.

EL.2025.4 · sg (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. a ELG)

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Submission of Medical Expense Claim

This provision defines the 15-month deadline for claiming sickness and disability costs, and its expiration justified the dismissal of the appeal.

EL.2025.14 · sg (Art. 15 lit. a ELG)

Claimant Denied Reimbursement for Untimely Health Insurance Cost-Sharing Claims Due to Missed Statutory Deadline

The appeal was dismissed because the costs were not claimed within the 15-month deadline stipulated by this article.

608 2024 23 · fr (art. 15 let. a LPC)

Father's Appeal for Retroactive Medical Reimbursement Denied Due to Lack of Standing and Untimely Filing

Cited in the reasoning for rejecting the appeal on the merits (had it been admissible), concerning the expiry of the 15-month deadline for requesting reimbursement of healthcare and disability expenses (FMI).

A/1810/2023 · ge (Art. 15 LPC)

Supplementary Benefits Reimbursement Claim Timeliness

This provision defines the conditions for reimbursement of medical expenses, which, when not met due to the late request, forms the basis for rejecting the appeal on the merits.

EL.2021.11 · bs (Art. 15 ELG)

Claimant v. Canton: Cantonal Cap on In-Home Care Reimbursement Versus Federal Minimum Disability Support

Cited as the basis for confirming that the claim for supplementary costs was made timely.

A/2094/2022 · ge (Art. 15 al. 2 LPC)

Claimant v. Administration Regarding Recalculation of Family Supplementary Benefits

Likely refers to the maximum amount of supplementary benefits.

608 2022 43 · fr (art. 15 LPC)

Cantonal Court Affirms Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Annualized Income Assessment

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that reimbursement of sickness and disability costs is subject to request.

Arr.t.2021.1078 · vd (Art. 15 LPC)

Insured Pensioner's Dental Cost Reimbursement Claim Rejected Due to Excess Income Threshold

This provision established the requirement that expenses must have occurred when the claimant met the conditions for benefits, which was considered alongside Art. 14 al. 6 LPC.

33.2021.4 · ti (Art. 15 lett. b LPC)

PC Recipient Denied Full Dental Coverage Due to Income Excess After Entitlement Cessation

Cited as a cumulative condition for reimbursement, establishing that expenses must have occurred during a period when the applicant met the conditions of Articles 4-6 LPC, which underpins the final decision.

ZL.2019.00089 · zh (Art. 15 lit. a ELG)

Claimant Denied Reimbursement for Untimely Insurance Claims Due to Missed Statutory Deadline

The provision establishing the 15-month deadline for claiming reimbursement of sickness and disability costs, which was the core issue in the case, is implicitly confirmed by the dismissal of the appeal.

A/1718/2019 · ge (Art. 15 LPC)

Dental Reimbursement Deadline Excusable Due to Appellant's Inability to Access Invoice

This article, setting the fifteen-month deadline for claiming reimbursement, was central to the decision, which ultimately found the claim was not time-barred based on when the claimant became aware of the invoice.

A/4313/2018 · ge (Art. 13 et 15 LPC)

Appeal on Supplementary Family Allowances: Hypothetical Income and Maintenance Calculation Remanded

Cited in reasoning 5, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-6, thus excluded.

A/4313/2018 · ge (Art. 15 al. 2 LPC)

Appeal on Supplementary Family Allowances: Hypothetical Income and Maintenance Calculation Remanded

Cited in reasoning 6, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-6, thus excluded.

A/1385/2019 · ge (Art. 15 LPC)

Appellant v. Supplementary Benefits Service (Pharmacy Reimbursement Deadline)

The court rejected the appeal because the claim for reimbursement of medical costs was time-barred according to the fifteen-month deadline stipulated in this article.