Art. 14 Loi portant introduction à la loi fédérale sur les prestations complémentaires à l'assurance-vieillesse, survivants et invalidité (LiLPC)

BGE 152 V 70 (Art. 14 al. 1 LPC)

Suspension of supplementary benefits and medical-cost reimbursement under disability insurance during incarceration or institutional therapeutic measure

Basis for suspending reimbursement of medical and disability costs when the annual supplementary benefit is suspended during incarceration.

BGE 150 V 105 (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. b ELG)

Supplementary benefits: no reimbursement for home care provided by cohabiting spouse included in joint needs calculation

The appeal was upheld and the case remanded because the cantonal regulation on reimbursement of care costs by family members, based on this federal framework provision, was found lawful and constitutional.

BGE 150 V 340 (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2-4 ELG)

Supplementary benefits coverage for family-provided care: cantonal restriction to assistance-person hourly rate upheld as lawful limit on reimbursable costs.

Main ground for the verdict; the court upheld the lower court's decision on the basis of this provision governing supplementary benefits for care costs.

63/2012/9 · sh (Art. 14 Abs. 1 ELG)

Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Administration (Heroin-Assisted Treatment Fee)

The court decision is based on the interpretation of Art. 14 para. 1 ELG regarding the catalog of costs covered by supplementary benefits.

63/2012/9 · sh (Art. 14 Abs. 2 ELG)

Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Administration (Heroin-Assisted Treatment Fee)

The court refers to Art. 14 para. 2 ELG when stating that cantons designate the costs that can be reimbursed under paragraph 1.

63/2012/9 · sh (Art. 14 Abs. 3 ELG)

Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Administration (Heroin-Assisted Treatment Fee)

The court cites Art. 14 para. 3 ELG in relation to the extent to which cantons must cover costs.

VBE.2025.26 · ag (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. b ELG)

Spitex Coverage Denial for Institutional Residents Affirmed

Cited as the basis for excluding the reimbursement of Spitex costs for individuals residing in a care home.

VB.2024.00714 · zh (Art. 14 Abs. I lit. d ELG)

Claimant Denied Retroactive Special Diet Benefits Due to Lack of Clear Indication

This provision concerning supplementary benefits is cited in the context of the substance of the dispute regarding the dietary surcharge.

VSBES.2025.137 · so (Art. 14 Abs. 6 ELG)

Social Insurance Reimbursement Denial Based on Retroactive Foreign Pension Income

This article provides the legal basis for denying compensation for health costs when an income surplus exists, which is the core issue resolved by dismissing the appeal.

A/1233/2025 · ge (art. 14 al. 1 let. g LPC)

Disability Benefit Reimbursement for Spouse's Hospitalization Daily Contributions

Although cited by the appellant, the court rejected the appeal, confirming that this article's mention of all cost-sharing under Art. 64 LAMal only covers deductibles and co-payments for PC beneficiaries, thereby rejecting the claim based on the hospitalization cost contribution.

ZL.2024.00005 · zh (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. e ELG)

Reimbursement of Transportation Costs for Medical Treatments Denied Due to Failure to Address All Claims

Cited to define the cantons' reimbursement of transport costs for recipients of annual supplementary benefits.

ZL.2024.00005 · zh (Art. 14 Abs. 2 ELG)

Reimbursement of Transportation Costs for Medical Treatments Denied Due to Failure to Address All Claims

Cited in relation to the cantons' ability to limit reimbursement to necessary expenses.

VSBES.2025.121 · so (Art. 14 Abs. 6 ELG)

Social Security Recipient Denied Reimbursement for Emergency Transport Costs Due to Income Surplus

This article, governing the right to reimbursement of sickness and disability costs for those not entitled to an annual supplementary benefit, is the underlying legal basis for the court's decision to reject the appeal, as discussed in section II.3.

ZL.2024.00114 · zh (Art. 14 Abs. 1 ELG)

Claimant v. Insurance Authority: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits

Cited in the reasoning, but not in the operative orders 1-3.

ZL.2024.00114 · zh (Art. 14 Abs. 1 lit. a ELG)

Claimant v. Insurance Authority: Denial of Supplementary Dental Benefits

Cited in the reasoning, but not in the operative orders 1-3.