814.20
WWGLGEAUXLGA
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 30 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 81. Santé » 814. Protection de l'équilibre écologique
Art. 30 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)
1 L’autorité communale compétente établit un plan d’entretien des eaux qu'elle soumet à l'Office de l'environnement pour approbation. Ce plan définit les travaux d'entretien programmés durant une période déterminée et les modalités d'exécution.
2 L'Office de l'environnement définit le contenu minimal du plan d’entretien des eaux.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (22)
A/2412/2024 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 LPAC)
Public Employee Dismissal Upheld for Sexual Harassment and Misconduct
Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal before the competent court (Chambre administrative).
A/3876/2023 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 et 31 LPAC)
Social Caretaker Dismissed for Fire Safety Breach
Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal concerning administrative law provisions.
A/3627/2022 · ge (art. 30 LPAC)
Employee Termination Appeal: Lack of Motivation Regarding Mitigating Factors
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the precedent set by the court on the analogy with cantonal personnel law, but not used in the final orders.
A/3390/2021 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 de la loi générale relative au personnel de l’administration cantonale, du pouvoir judiciaire et des établissements publics médicaux du 4 décembre 1997 (LPAC))
Police Officer Disciplinary Penalty Upheld for Inadequate Response to Domestic Threats
Cited as a basis for declaring the appeal admissible (procedural context for admissibility).
A/388/2024 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 LPAC)
Employee Suspension Upheld for Asbestos Risk Management Failures
Cited as part of the procedural provisions establishing the admissibility of the appeal, as the appellant is subject to the LPAC.
A/1357/2016 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Procedural Reintegration Failure
Cited for the admissibility of the appeal to the competent jurisdiction.
A/3233/2016 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 et 32 de la loi générale relative au personnel de l’administration cantonale et des établissements publics médicaux du 4 décembre 1997 - LPAC - B 5 05)
Employee Dismissal Annulled Due to Time-Barred Disciplinary Action
Cited as a general ground for admissibility of the appeal.
A/572/2015 · ge (art. 30 al. 3 cum 31 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Alleged Signature Forgery Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof
Cited in relation to the requirement for reinstatement if the revocation is found unlawful due to a lack of breach of service duties.
A/1346/2011 · ge (art. 30 al. 3 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Following Acquittal in Workplace Altercation
Cited as the provision through which Art. 31 LPAC applies.
A/3999/2010 · ge (art. 30 al. 2 LPAC)
Employee Reprimand Upheld for Persistent Professional Misconduct
This article was cited as the procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal.
A/1967/2009 · ge (art. 30 al.1 LPAC)
Hospital Employee Reprimand Annulled Over Patient Restraint Conduct
Cited in the reasoning section (En Droit, point 1) as part of the basis for declaring the appeal admissible, which is prerequisite for the main orders.
A/3012/2008 · ge (art. 30 alinéa 2 de la LPAC)
Supervisor Appeal: Salary Reduction Over Student Slap Overturned
Cited to establish the receivability of the appeal filed by the employee who received a disciplinary sanction.
VPB 04-1481-6241 (art. 30, let. b, LEaux)
Hydropower Heritage vs. Environmental Flow Requirements
Cited as a possible solution for a specific case by limiting water abstraction.
A/2249/2003 · ge (art. 30 et 31 LPAC a contrario)
Employee Termination During Probation Upheld Despite Procedural Review Limitations
Used in conjunction with Art. 56B al. 4 litt. a LOJ to establish the Tribunal's lack of jurisdiction regarding the prolongation of the probationary period.
A/532/2000 · ge (Art. 30 al. 1 LPAC)
Cantonal Fund Reprimand Review Incompetence
This provision defines the appeal path for a reprimand (blâme), leading to the finding that the administrative tribunal is not competent for this specific sanction.