814.20
WWGLGEAUXLGA
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 3 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 81. Santé » 814. Protection de l'équilibre écologique
Art. 3 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)
1 Par gestion des eaux de surface, la loi entend toute activité ayant trait à la planification, à l’entretien, à la reconstitution, à la revitalisation, à la protection contre les crues et au contrôle des eaux de surface.
2 Par approvisionnement en eau, la loi entend toute activité ayant trait à la planification, à la réalisation, au maintien et à l’optimisation de la valeur, à l’exploitation et au contrôle des installations de captage, de traitement et de distribution des eaux servant à la consommation, y compris les mesures de protection des eaux souterraines.
3 Par assainissement, la loi entend toute activité ayant trait à la planification, à la réalisation, au maintien et à l’optimisation de la valeur, à l’exploitation et au contrôle des installations d’évacuation et de traitement des eaux usées et pluviales.
4 Par eaux de surface, la loi désigne les écosystèmes d’eau courante et autres plans d’eau, permanents ou temporaires.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (22)
BRGE.IV.Nr.0052.201 · zh (Art. 3 GSchG)
Heating Oil Spill: Driver's Negligence Leads to 70% Cost Allocation
Establishes the general obligation to exercise due care to avoid negative impacts on waters.
VB.2005.00037 · zh (Art. 3 GSchG)
Appealability of Rejection of Environmental Waste Disposal Enforcement
Implicitly applied as the general legal basis for the original order concerning water protection, which the court ultimately confirmed.
VB.2005.00037 · zh (Art. 3 GSchG)
Appeal Regarding PCB-Contaminated Plastic Mat Disposal Order
The court confirmed the first instance decision based on this provision concerning water protection.
A/3037/2021 · ge (art. 3 al. 1 et al. 4 LEaux)
Appeal Regarding Municipal Construction Permit for Public Lake Access Dismissed
Cited in the legal reasoning regarding the definition of high average water levels, although the final orders only cite the procedural provisions for admissibility and costs.
AC.2021.0086 · vd (Art. 3 LEaux)
Property Owner v. Maintenance Contractor: Oil Spill Cost Allocation Reassessment
The behavior of the company's employee violated the duty of diligence required by this article to prevent water pollution.
SK 2019 482 · be (Art. 3, 4 lit. c u. 71 Abs. 1 lit. a GSchG)
Cantonal High Court Upholds Conviction for Endangerment of Life and Weapons Offenses; Imposes Imprisonment and Deportation Order.
Cited alongside aWG provisions for the determination of the fine (Übertretungsbusse) related to the recognized weapon and water protection offenses.
SB170118 · zh (Art. 70 Abs. 1 lit. a i.V.m. Art. 70 Abs. 2 GSchG i.V.m. Art. 3 und 6 GSchG)
Negligent Pollution and Animal Cruelty Conviction Upheld for Foreman's Wastewater Order
Basis for upholding the conviction for the negligent offense against the Water Protection Act.
BRGE.IV.Nr.0042.201 · zh (Art. 3 GSchG)
Water Utility v. Groundwater Extraction Permit
This provision obliges everyone to take all due care to avoid adverse effects on waters.
AC.2014.0144 · vd (art. 3 LEaux)
Environmental Authority vs. Pig Farm Owner: Easement Cancellation Overruled in Pollution Case
This article was cited as the basis for the order against the appellant concerning the diversion of the use of the underground tank, despite the subsequent annulment of the part related to the servitude's cancellation.
110 2013 312 · be (Art. 3 GSchG)
Appeal on Retrospective Building Permit for Equestrian Facilities in Water Protection Zone
Applied to justify the necessity of ordering conformity measures because the existing drainage violated the general duty of care to avoid detrimental impacts on waters.
B.2012.152 · sg (Art. 3 GSchG)
Calf Igloos as Stalls Under Water Protection Law
Cited by the administrative office (AFU) in the reasoning regarding the general duty of care to avoid water pollution, which justifies the final decision.
B.2012.161 · sg (Art. 3 GSchG)
Calf Igloo Systems as Stable-Like Facilities Subject to Building Permits and Water Protection Regulations
The court considered that the calf igloo operation, as currently practiced on meadow land, poses a concrete danger of water pollution, particularly through nutrients washed out by rain and meltwater into the drains.
B.2012.152 · sg (Art. 3 GSchG)
Calf Igloos Subject to Building Permits and Water Protection Regulations
Cited as part of the legal basis determining that the calf igloo facility is equivalent to a stable and requires adequate waterproofing due to the risk of water pollution.
B.2012.161 · sg (Art. 3 GSchG)
Farmer Must Channel Calf Igloo Runoff to Slurry Pit
The general requirement of due diligence to avoid adverse effects on water bodies was used to justify the requirement for impervious flooring and drainage in the final decision.
VB.2010.00352 · zh (Art. 3 GSchG)
Water Protection Zone Company Must Implement Hazardous Material Storage and Firewater Retention Measures
Cited as the legal basis for the provisions concerning protection against water pollution.