814.20
WWGLGEAUXLGA
CH-JU
CH-JU
Art. 27 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)
8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 81. Santé » 814. Protection de l'équilibre écologique
Art. 27 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)
1 En règle générale, la procédure décisive est celle du plan spécial selon la législation sur les constructions et l’aménagement du territoire ou, lorsque l'aménagement doit être réalisé dans le cadre d'un projet d'amélioration foncière ou de l'octroi d'une concession au sens de l'article 42, la procédure y relative.
2 Pour les projets dont l'étendue est limitée, la procédure du permis de construire s'applique.
3 Lorsqu'un projet consiste à déconstruire totalement ou partiellement un ouvrage lié à une installation hydraulique et situé dans le lit ou sur la berge d'un cours d'eau, la procédure d'autorisation de police des eaux s'applique.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (17)
A/3473/2019 · ge (Art. 27 al. 2 LPAC)
Public Servant Disciplinary Dismissal for Unauthorized Archive Access Upheld
Cited because the State Council must order an administrative investigation before imposing a revocation.
A/3463/2018 · ge (art. 27 al. 7 LPAC)
Social Worker Dismissed for Consensual Relationship with Client Mother
This article regarding the prescription of disciplinary action was cited in the legal reasoning supporting the penalty.
A/1245/2018 · ge (art. 27 al. 7 LPAC)
Employee Revocation Appeal Upheld Due to Prescription and Proportionality
Used to establish that the disciplinary action concerning the activity as head of accounting was time-barred (prescribed).
A/3676/2009 · ge (art. 27 al. 7 LPAC)
Police Chief Disciplinary Investigation Jurisdiction and Prescription Period
Cited as being substantively identical to Art. 37 al. 6 LPol concerning the prescription period for disciplinary responsibility.
7R 20 1 · lu (Art. 27 GSchG)
Cantonal Water Protection Ordinance Amendments Upheld Against Competence and Rights Challenges
Federal law on water protection provided the basis for the cantonal measures, which were examined under this provision.
A/1485/2019 · ge (Art. 27 LPAC)
Public Employee Back Wages and Sick Leave Entitlement Dispute
Cited to define the conditions for opening an administrative investigation, relevant to the context of the suspension.
A/3233/2016 · ge (art. 27 al. 7 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Annulled Due to Time-Barred Disciplinary Action
This provision, concerning the prescription of disciplinary liability being suspended during an administrative investigation, determined the final ruling that the disciplinary action was time-barred.
A/572/2015 · ge (art. 27 al. 2 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Alleged Signature Forgery Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof
Cited in relation to the authority to order an administrative investigation.
A/572/2015 · ge (art. 27 al. 3 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Alleged Signature Forgery Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof
Cited regarding the notification and assistance rights during an administrative investigation.
A/572/2015 · ge (art. 27 al. 4 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Alleged Signature Forgery Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof
Cited regarding the deadlines and procedure for administrative investigations, referenced in the reasoning against the delay.
A/572/2015 · ge (art. 27 al. 5 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Alleged Signature Forgery Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof
Cited regarding the right of the interested party to comment on the investigation report.
A/572/2015 · ge (art. 27 al. 6 LPAC)
Employee Dismissal Over Alleged Signature Forgery Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof
Cited regarding the deadline for the administrative body to rule after an investigation is completed.
A/2677/2012 · ge (art. 27 LPAC)
Cook Dismissed for Sexual Harassment Upheld
Cited to describe the procedure for opening an administrative investigation, which was a prerequisite for the decision.
A/1308/2001 · ge (art. 27 al. 2 LPAC)
Civil Servant Suspension for Alleged Medical Certificate Fraud
Cited to establish the requirement to open an administrative investigation when considering termination for an objectively founded reason.
A/966/2001 · ge (Art. 27 al. 2 LPAC)
Appeal Against Administrative Inquiry Rejected Despite ECHR Compliance Review
Cited in the reasoning to show that the decision to open an administrative inquiry falls under the administration's free assessment power.