Art. 24 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)

A/398/2022 · ge (art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Employee v. Public Department on Contract Termination and Indemnity

Cited in the context of the termination procedure applicable to auxiliaries with open-ended contracts.

A/1029/2017 · ge (art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Termination of Auxiliary Employee Upheld Despite Lack of Demonstrable Cause

The court ruled on the termination of employment relationships based on this provision concerning auxiliary staff on an indefinite contract.

A/3834/2015 · ge (art. 24 al. 1 LPAC)

Trainee Contract Expiry Upheld Over Claim of Indefinite Employment Conversion

Cited in the reasoning (point 9) as the legal basis for the termination of fixed-term contracts upon expiry, which supports the final rejection of the action.

A/3128/2011 · ge (Art. 24 al. 1 LPAC)

Auxiliary Employee v. Department on Good Faith and Appointment Refusal

Cited as context for the general rule that fixed-term contracts end upon expiration without a right to renewal, supporting the decision not to grant a right to nomination.

A/3227/2022 · ge (art. 24 al. 1 LPAC)

Auxiliary Employee Fixed-Term Contract Challenge Rejected

The court referenced this article concerning the automatic termination of fixed-term contracts, which supports the decision to reject the appeal regarding the end of service.

A/2905/2020 · ge (art. 24 al. 1 LPAC)

Auxiliary Employee Contract Non-Renewal Discrimination Claim

Cited to confirm that the termination of the fixed-term contract upon expiry was lawful and not a breach of procedure.

A/2905/2020 · ge (art. 24 LPAC)

Employment Contract Termination and Discrimination Appeal (Disability and Sex)

Cited in the reasoning to establish that fixed-term contracts end automatically (ipso iure), which is the basis for rejecting the appeal against the non-renewal of the contract.

A/1222/2019 · ge (art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Auxiliary Staff Termination as Disguised Sanction

Cited in the reasoning section to support the interpretation that ending an indefinite contract requires respecting the notice period, which influenced the characterization of the appealed act.

A/81/2013 · ge (art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Architect Termination Upheld Due to Performance Failures and Procurement Mismanagement

Cited in the reasoning concerning the required notice period for termination of the contract for a specialized agent on an indefinite term, and implicitly supports the formal validity of the termination.

A/3171/2012 · ge (Art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Probationary Auxiliary Employee Dismissal Upheld Due to Security Non-Compliance

Cited implicitly as the standard defining the respect of the right to be heard for the auxiliary being dismissed, which the court found was respected.

A/4525/2008 · ge (art. 24 al. 1 LPAC)

Auxiliary Employee Fixed-Term Contract Expiration Not Appealable Decision

Cited in the reasoning section to establish that fixed-term contracts expire upon reaching their end date, which supports the finding that the letter was not a decision, but this provision is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

A/4525/2008 · ge (art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Auxiliary Employee Fixed-Term Contract Expiration Not Appealable Decision

Cited in the reasoning section regarding termination of open-ended auxiliary contracts, but this provision is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

A/2347/2005 · ge (Art. 24 al. 2 LPAC)

Public Employee Dismissal Notice Period and Hearing Requirements

This provision governs the termination of employment contracts for auxiliary staff with indefinite duration, which is the core subject of the dispute regarding the legality of the dismissal.

A/1143/2003 · ge (Art. 24 alinéa 1 LPAC)

Appeal Regarding Non-Renewal of Fixed-Term Contract and Denial of Right to Be Heard

Cited in the reasoning to establish that fixed-term contracts end automatically, supporting the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible regarding contract renewal.

A/233/1999 · ge (art. 24 alinéa premier LPAC)

Fixed-Term Contract Non-Renewal and Claim for Reliance Damages

The first part of the appeal concerning the non-renewal of the fixed-term contract was declared inadmissible because the service relationship ended by the expiration of the contract as per this article.