Art. 18 Loi sur la gestion des eaux (LGEaux)

VVGE.1971.75.Nr.87 · ow (Art. 18 GSchG)

Zoning Decision Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw; Property Not Rezoned Due to Safety and Infrastructure Concerns

Cited as a basis for the requirement of connection to the general sewage project (GKP) for sewage connection, with exceptions.

VVGE.1978.80.Nr.63 · ow (Art. 18 Abs. 1 GSchG)

Municipality's Responsibility for Sewage System Financing and Civil Jurisdiction for Landowner Agreements

Requires connection to public sewage systems for all wastewater within defined areas.

VVGE.1985.86.Nr.65 · ow (Art. 18 Abs. 1 GSchG)

Drainage Cooperative Liability for Sewage Contributions Based on Wastewater Generation and Location

Cited in the reasoning to support the general principle that all wastewater should be connected to the central system, unless specific exceptions apply, reinforcing the argument that the location in a green zone does not exempt from the connection obligation.

AC.2010.0225 · vd (art. 18 LEaux)

Appeal Against Building Permit Approval for Mixed-Use Development Due to Procedural Flaws and Insufficient Environmental Justification

Cited in the reasoning to define the exceptional conditions under which a derogation from immediate connection to the public sewer system can be granted.

AC.2010.0087 · vd (Art. 18 LEaux)

Municipal Building Permit Revoked for Lack of Wastewater Disposal Compliance

The appeal was allowed because the cumulative conditions of this article regarding exceptions to mandatory connection to public sewage were not met, leading to the conclusion that the property was not equipped.

AC.2010.0106 · vd (Art. 18 LEaux)

Appeal on Construction Permit Violation of Floor Area Ratio and Sewage Connection

The decision to annul the building permit was based on the finding that the cumulative conditions for the derogation allowing individual sewage treatment facilities were not met.

52.2010.414 · ti (art. 18 cpv. 1 LPAc)

Administrative Court Voids Building Permit for Substantial Expansion in Protected Zone

The court found that the condition for exception regarding wastewater disposal—that connection to the sewage system must be possible in the short term—was not met under this provision.

52.2008.104 · ti (art. 18 LPAc)

Building Permit Appeal Over Sewage Disposal Method in Rocky Subsoil

Cited in the final orders preamble, as the legal basis for the requirements concerning wastewater disposal, which was central to the partial annulment.

AC.2002.0182 · vd (art. 18 LEaux)

Property Owners v. Municipality over Mandatory Sewage Connection

Cited in the reasoning to assess the possibility of an exception to the connection obligation for existing buildings.

52.2004.317 · ti (art. 18 LPAc)

Property Owner v. Building Permit for Lakeside Restroom and Shore Consolidation

Cited in the final orders as a legal basis, relevant to the issue of sewage connection which caused the partial annulment.

52.2004.81 · ti (art. 18 LPAc)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Pool Drainage Violating Water Protection Laws

The appeal was accepted because the conditions for the exception under this article (concerning the absence of immediate connection to the public sewer system) were not met.

AC.1996.0127 · vd (Art. 18 LEaux)

Property Owner Sewage Connection Refusal Upheld

The court explicitly ruled that the conditions for granting a temporary derogation to the connection obligation under this article were not met.

AC.1996.0041 · vd (art. 18 al. 1 LEaux)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Mandatory Sewer Connection Obligation Upheld Despite Vacancy

This provision was analyzed to determine if it allowed the court to grant the delay requested by the appellant, but the court concluded it was not applicable.

52.2004.317 · ti (art. 18 LPAc)

Landowner Permit Dispute Over Lakeside Restroom and Stabilization Works

The decision explicitly cites this article in the concluding enumeration of applied laws concerning wastewater connections in temporary situations.

52.2004.81 · ti (art. 18 LPAc)

Cantonal Court Annuls Building Permit Over Non-Compliance with Water Protection Law Regarding Pool Discharge

The appeal was upheld because the conditions for the exceptional authorization under this article were not met.