Art. 31 Loi sur les établissements hospitaliers

9.2024.117 · ti (art. 31 cpv. 1 LPMA)

Appeal Regarding Recusal of Psycho-Social Service and Expert Evaluation Modalities

This provision is cited as applicable regarding the grounds for recusal of experts appointed by the Regional Protection Authorities.

9.2015.116 · ti (art. 31 cpv. 3 LPMA)

Motion to Recuse Regional Protection Authority Denied for Lack of Individualized Allegations

The text mentions this article in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Appellate Court's Chamber to rule on the incident when the entire protection authority is challenged, although the final order relies on procedural grounds for inadmissibility.

9.2013.117 · ti (art. 31 LPMA)

Prospective Parents' Appeal of Custodian Appointment in International Adoption Upheld

Cited to define the scope of recusal concerning members of the Protection Authority and the Chamber of Protection.

90.1996.24 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Hazard Zoning Justified Despite Subsequent Risk Reduction; Redundant Planning Zone Order Leads to Cost Award

Cited as the basis for ordering the losing party to pay costs/reimbursement.

90.1994.339 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Property Owner Appeal Against Expired Planning Zone Struck from Record

This procedural rule is cited as the basis for condemning the losing party to pay costs and counterclaims, although ultimately no costs or counterclaims were awarded.

90.1994.357 · ti (art. 31 LPAm, cui rimanda l’art. 38 cpv. 6 LALPT)

Property Owners Appeal Expired Planning Zone and Building Moratorium

Cited in the reasoning section describing the basis for ordering costs against the losing party, which informs the final order on costs.

90.1994.304 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Property Zoning Dispute Rendered Moot by Subsequent Administrative Action

Cited as the legal basis for ordering the respondent (the Canton) to pay costs/indemnities to the appellant.

90.1994.305 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Property Owner v. Cantonal Authority (Mootness)

Cited as the basis for ordering the respondent authority (Cantone) to pay costs/indemnity to the appellant due to the resolution being modified in favor of the appellant.

90.1994.306 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Property Dispute Mooted by Subsequent Rezoning

Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for ordering costs/indemnities when a party acquiesces or the case becomes moot, which is then applied in order 2.

90.1996.76 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Expired Planning Zone Renders Appeals Moot; Costs Denied Due to Procedural Fault

Cited as the basis for the general rule on awarding costs.

90.1996.76 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Expired Planning Zone Renders Appeals Moot; Costs Denied Due to Procedural Fault

Cited as the basis for the rule concerning the award of costs (ripetibili) in general.

90.1995.69 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Property Owner Appeal Moot Due to Plan Amendment

This article was cited to determine which provision governs the award of costs (indennità) to the opposing party.

90.2000.8 · ti (Art. 31 LPAm)

Appeal Regarding Use of Non-Zoned Building Rendered Moot by Authority Concession

This provision, cited via Art. 38 cpv. 6 LALPT, forms the basis for ordering the respondent (the Canton) to pay legal costs/indemnities to the appellant.

90.1998.32 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Land Use Appeal Withdrawal and Cost Award

Cited as the basis for ordering the losing party (the Canton) to pay costs (indennità) to the opposing party.

90.1994.278 · ti (art. 31 LPAm)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Moot Appeal on Rezoning

Although this article is cited in connection with costs, it is the legal basis used for awarding 'ripetibili' (costs reimbursement) against the Municipality.