Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
810.11 CH-JU

Art. 29 Loi sur les établissements hospitaliers

8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 81. Santé » 810. Généralités, promotion de la santé, soins hospitaliers et soins à domicile
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (64 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 29 Loi sur les établissements hospitaliers

1 L'Hôpital du Jura détermine l'organisation générale de ses sites.

2 Il assume la coordination, la collaboration et la complémentarité des sites, gérés comme un tout.

3 ...

4 Le conseil d'administration de l'Hôpital du Jura édicte un règlement régissant l'activité, la structure et la direction des départements et des services interhospitaliers.

← Art. 28 Loi sur les établissements hospitaliers 8. Santé, travail, sécurité sociale » 81. Santé » 810. Généralités, promotion de la santé, soins hospitaliers et soins à domicile Art. 30 Loi sur les établissements hospitaliers →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (27)

9.2022.154 · ti (art. 29 LPMA)
Cost Apportionment in Child Relocation Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the taxing authority's power to set fees, which is relevant to the contested fee decision.
9.2022.90 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Parents' Appeal Against Child Protection Order Denied Over Cognitive Fragility Concerns
Used to justify the decision on procedural costs, stating that the Authority can order the losing party to pay costs.
9.2021.40 · ti (art. 29 LPMA)
Mother's Exclusive Parental Authority Upheld Over Father's Joint Authority Claim
Applied to justify the decision on costs and fees for the first instance decision.
9.2020.47 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Appeal Regarding Unverified Expert Fee in Child Protection Case
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle that expert costs are procedural costs following the outcome of the procedure, which supports the decision to dismiss the appeal regarding the cost taxation.
9.2019.192 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 1 lett. a) LPMA)
Guardianship Account Fee Excessive Due to Estate Size
This provision sets the basis for the fees applicable to the approval of accounts, which the court partially modified in its final order.
9.2018.199 · ti (Art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Protection Authority Cost Allocation Appeal
This provision, concerning the allocation of procedural costs based on the outcome, was central to the analysis regarding the allocation of the expert's fees, although the final decision resulted in the Authority being held liable for costs.
9.2017.121 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Parental Relationship Assessment Fee Dispute and Expert Instruction Validity
Cited in the reasoning to determine that procedural costs (like expert fees) follow the principle of losing party, which underpins the decision on costs.
9.2014.159 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Father v. Mother: Division of Child Psychologist Assessment Costs
Cited in the reasoning regarding the power of regional protection authorities to charge costs to the losing party in protection proceedings.
9.2014.91 · ti (Art. 29 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Appeal on Costs Following Incapacitated Individual's Repatriation and Curatorship Revocation
Cited in the reasoning to establish the scope for setting court fees, which was reformed in order 1.
9.2014.184 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Parents' Liability for Costs of Child Protective Measures
Cited as the basis for allocating procedure costs according to the principle of losing party (soccombenza).
9.2014.80 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Appeal Against Equal Cost Allocation for Parental Capacity Evaluation in Protection Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning to establish that costs of the protection procedure follow the principle of the losing party, which is the basis for ordering the costs in the final decision.
9.2013.277 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 LPMA)
Parental Liability for Child Protection Expert Fees
Cited in the reasoning concerning the application of procedural costs principles, but not explicitly in the final orders (2. Not included).
9.2014.43 · ti (art. 29 LPMA)
Guardian Appeal of Untaxed Fiduciary Invoice
This provision regulates the charging of fees by Regional Protection Authorities, which was central to the challenged request, although the final decision did not impose a fee.
9.2013.195 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Appeal Regarding Revocation of Curatorship and Administrative Fees for Child Maintenance Proceedings
Cited in reasoning section 2 to establish the regional protection authorities' power to apply fees to their decisions.
9.2013.203 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 1 LPMA)
Guardian Appeal of Protection Fee for Ward's 2012 Account
Cited as the legal basis for the Regional Protection Authorities to apply specific fees in their decisions, which is central to the dispute.