801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 86 Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - Baubewilligung

Formelles Baurecht - Bewilligungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (137 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 86 KRG · Baubewilligung

1. Bauten und Anlagen (Bauvorhaben) dürfen nur mit schriftlicher Baubewilligung der kommunalen Baubehörde errichtet, geändert, abgebrochen oder in ihrem Zweck geändert werden. Der Baubewilligungspflicht unterliegen auch Zweckänderungen von Grundstücken, sofern erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Nutzungsordnung zu erwarten sind.

2. Zeitlich begrenzte Bauvorhaben sowie solche, die weder öffentliche noch private Interessen berühren, unterliegen nicht der Baubewilligungspflicht. Die Regierung bestimmt durch Verordnung, welche Bauvorhaben keiner Baubewilligung bedürfen, und legt für diese eine Anzeigepflicht fest. Sie trifft für Bauten und Anlagen innerhalb und ausserhalb der Bauzonen die gleiche Regelung, soweit das Bundesrecht dies zulässt.

3. Die Gemeinden können im Baugesetz nicht baubewilligungspflichtige Bauvorhaben dem vereinfachten Baubewilligungsverfahren unterstellen.

4. Vorbehalten bleiben abweichende eidgenössische oder kantonale Bestimmungen für Bauvorhaben, die nicht der kommunalen Baubewilligungshoheit unterliegen.

← Art. 85 KRG Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - Gegenstand Art. 87 KRG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (38)

VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 86 KRG)

Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed

Cited generally regarding the requirement for a written building permit, which underpins the entire appeal subject matter.

R 2024 7 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed for Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Bathroom

Cited to establish that construction projects require a written building permit from municipal authorities, relevant to the rejection of the permit.

R 2024 31 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Municipal Denial of Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Habitation Upheld

Cited in the reasoning (E.4.1, E.4.2) as the basis for requiring a written building permit for changes in use.

R 2022 38 · gr (Art. 86 KRG)

Material Storage Site Illegality and Permit Requirement Appeal

Cited regarding the Baubewilligungspflicht (building permit requirement) for land-use changes with significant impacts on land use planning.

R 2022 77 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KRG)

Land Use Violation Outside Building Zone and Permit Requirements

The court confirmed that the use constitutes a change of use with significant effects on the use regulations, justifying the requirement for a building permit.

R 2023 25 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Dismissed as Moot Due to Voluntary Removal; Costs Split.

Cited in the reasoning concerning the requirement for a building permit.

R 2022 1 · gr (Art. 86 KRG)

Solar Installation Permit Denial Upheld Despite Procedural Defect

Cited to establish that a written building permit from the communal authority is required in this case.

R 2020 3 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 Satz 1 KRG)

Municipality v. Property Owner: Unauthorized Patio Roof Setback Violation

Cited to refute the claim that construction could begin based on verbal communication, emphasizing that construction requires a written building permit.

R 2018 83 · gr (Art. 86 ff. KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Waste Container Relocation and Emissions

Used as context for building permit procedures.

R 2019 97 · gr (Art. 86 cpv. 3 LPTC)

Alterations to Annex Roof Requiring Formal Building Application Over Simplified Notification

Cited regarding the application of the simplified procedure for projects exempt from the building license obligation.

R 2019 40 · gr (art. 86 cpv. 1 LPTC)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Denial of Building Permit for Woodshed Conversion and Associated Fee

Provision establishing the general requirement for a written building permit, used to justify why the appellant's notification was insufficient.

R 2014 102 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Building Fine Appeal Dismissed for Unauthorized Construction Violations by Professionals

The appellants were found to have repeatedly violated the objective requirements of Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG (building without a permit for changes).

R 2014 71 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Construction Without Permit Upheld

Cited to establish that construction requires a written building permit, confirming the formal violation.

R 2014 8 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Regarding Retrospective Permits, Preservation Zone Violations, and Fines

Cited as the rule establishing the prior need for a building permit, which was violated.

R 2013 218 · gr (Art. 86 Abs. 1 KRG)

Appeal Against Denial of Building Permit for Erotic Services Business in Moderately Disturbing Zone

Cited to establish that pure changes of use are subject to building permits, relevant for procedural context but not the final decision on the merits in order 1.