Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
801.100 KRGLPTC CH-GR

Art. 81 Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - Besitzstand

Kantonale Bauvorschriften - Besitzstand und Ausnahmen innerhalb der Bauzonen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (137 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 81 KRG · Besitzstand

1. Rechtmässig erstellte Bauten und Anlagen, die den geltenden Vorschriften nicht mehr entsprechen, dürfen erhalten und erneuert werden.

2. Solche Bauten und Anlagen dürfen zudem umgebaut, massvoll erweitert oder in ihrer Nutzung geändert werden, wenn dadurch die Abweichung von den geltenden Vorschriften nicht verstärkt wird und keine überwiegenden öffentlichen oder nachbarlichen Interessen entgegenstehen.

3. Die Gemeinden können im Baugesetz auch den Wiederaufbau nach Zerstörung oder Abbruch ohne Rücksicht auf die geltenden Vorschriften der Regelbauweise für zulässig erklären (Hofstattrecht). Sie regeln die Einzelheiten unter Berücksichtigung der öffentlichen und nachbarlichen Interessen.

4. Vorbehalten bleiben besondere gesetzliche Anpassungs- oder Sanierungspflichten sowie besondere Regelungen des eidgenössischen oder kantonalen Rechts über die Anwendung neuer Vorschriften auf bestehende Bauten und Anlagen.

← Art. 80 KRG Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - Gegenstand Art. 82 KRG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (23)

VR3 2024 45 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Municipality Overreach on Existing Mobile Antenna Modifications
The court found that the municipal rule infringed upon the scope of the extended property rights guarantee regulated by this article.
PVG 2024 11 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Cantonal Guarantee Interpretation: Permissible Alteration vs. Inadmissible New Construction
This provision establishes the cantonal guarantee of the existing state (possession protection) which forms the core legal issue analyzed to determine the validity of the building permit.
R 2023 77 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld Due to Excessive Area Expansion and Insufficient Documentation
The appeal was granted because the planned construction would aggravate the existing illegal situation regarding land use intensity, invoking property rights protection.
R 2021 74 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 3 KRG)
Appeal Against Barn Rebuilding Permit Upheld Due to Expired Heritage Rights and Aesthetic Non-Compliance
Cited in the definition of Hofstattrecht (special institution of possession guarantee).
R 2023 83 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit for House Expansion: New Construction vs. Permissible Alteration
The core of the decision: the court ruled that the building measures constituted a new construction rather than an extension under the extended protection of existing structures (Besitzstandsgarantie), leading to the annulment of the permit.
R 2023 86 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for House Extension
Basis for the judgment ruling that the project, qualified as a new construction due to its nature, is unlawfully permitted under the extended homeowners' guarantee.
PVG 2023 10 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 3 KRG)
Municipal Authority Building Permit Approval Overturned for Incorrect Road Setback Basis
Cited in the dispositive as part of the legal basis (in conjunction with Art. 14 BauG) for the municipality to review the building permit under the rules of 'Hofstattrecht' upon remand.
R 2021 64 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 1 KRG)
Municipal Decision to Suspend 5G Antenna Upgrade Upheld on Procedural and Substantive Grounds
Cited in the reasoning regarding the continuation of use/renovation rights, used to analyze the substantive appeal which was not reached due to non-admission.
R 2021 64 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 2 KRG)
Municipal Decision to Suspend 5G Antenna Upgrade Upheld on Procedural and Substantive Grounds
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for conversion or reasonable extension, used to analyze the substantive appeal which was not reached due to non-admission.
R 2021 64 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Municipal Decision to Suspend 5G Antenna Upgrade Upheld on Procedural and Substantive Grounds
Cited in the reasoning regarding the continuation of use/renovation rights, used to analyze the substantive appeal which was not reached due to non-admission.
U 2017 35 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Procurement Appeal Dismissed Regarding Winter Maintenance Contract Award Based on Weighted Criteria
Cited in the reasoning concerning vested rights (Bestandesschutz) related to zoning issues, although the primary zoning review was rejected on procedural grounds.
R 2016 86 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Municipality v. Appellant: FAR Calculation and Vested Rights in Mixed Zone Conversion
The appeal regarding the vested rights guarantee was dismissed because the necessary prerequisites were not proven.
R 2010 103 · gr (Art. 81 KRG)
Restaurant/Hotel Conversion Denial Upheld on Commercial Use Justification
The appeal was rejected because the requested use change did not benefit from the legal protection of acquired rights (Besitzstandsgarantie).
R 2010 3 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 1 KRG)
Owner v. Municipal Board (Restaurant to Bank Conversion Denial)
Cited in the reasoning to explain why the existing use guarantee (Bestandesgarantie) does not apply to allow the conversion to a bank.
R 2010 3 · gr (Art. 81 Abs. 2 KRG)
Owner v. Municipal Board (Restaurant to Bank Conversion Denial)
Cited in the reasoning to explain why the existing use guarantee (Bestandesgarantie) does not apply to allow the conversion to a bank.