801.100
KRGLPTC
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 64 Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - 3. Gebühren
Ortsplanung - Erschliessung
Art. 64 KRG · 3. Gebühren
1. Gebühren werden erhoben zur Deckung der Kosten für den Bau, den Betrieb, den Unterhalt und die Erneuerung von Versorgungs- und Entsorgungsanlagen.
2. Die Gemeinden bestimmen in einem Gemeindeerlass, welche Gebühren erhoben werden. Sie legen den Kreis der Gebührenpflichtigen sowie die Bemessungsgrundlagen und die Gebührenansätze fest und regeln das Verfahren für die Veranlagung und den Bezug der Gebühren.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (6)
A 2017 56 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies
Cited as the basis for the municipality's authority to issue the EGG regarding fees.
A 2012 29 · gr (Art. 64 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)
Property Owner Challenge to Municipal Fixed Service Fees for Closed Commercial Property
Cited as the legal basis for the power of municipalities to levy usage and supply fees to cover costs.
PVG 2008 23 · gr (Art. 64 Abs. 1 E-KRG (heute: Art. 62 Abs. 1 KRG))
Development Contribution Calculation Based on Net Costs After Subsidies
Cited in the legislative materials to support the interpretation that the financial provisions apply generally to planning law development measures.
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Constitutional Appeal Against Municipal Connection Fees and Development Contributions
Cited in reasoning regarding municipal competence for fee assessment, but not directly applied in the dispositive orders.
R 2005 75 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Petitioner v. Municipality Regarding Hotel-to-Residence Conversion Restriction
Although the text mentions the costs aspect in paragraph 3.c, the specific legal basis for ordering cost reimbursement is typically found in the LTF for federal court decisions, or cantonal procedural law for administrative court decisions. Given the context, the actual basis for the cost order is found in the following provisions.
R 2005 71 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Property Owner Challenge to Restrictive Municipal Land-Use Plan Upheld
This article is cited as the basis for granting legal aid to the appellant (though implicitly, as the dispositive only concerns costs and fees in this case, but the structure suggests procedural grounds are primary).