801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 108 Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - 2. Verfahren

Schlussbestimmungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (137 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 108 KRG · 2. Verfahren

1. Für Baugesuche, Planungen und Verfahren, die im Zeitpunkt des In-Kraft-Tretens dieses Gesetzes hängig sind, gilt unter Vorbehalt nachfolgender Bestimmungen neues Recht

1. Hängige kommunale Baubewilligungs-, Planungs- und andere Verfahren werden bis zu deren Abschluss auf Gemeindeebene nach den bisherigen Zuständigkeits- und Verfahrensvorschriften weitergeführt. Für Rechtsmittel gilt neues Recht;

2. Streitigkeiten aus Nachbarrecht gemäss Artikel 89 - 95 und 101 Absatz 1 und 2 EGzZBG[12], die vor In-Kraft-Treten dieses Gesetzes anhängig gemacht worden sind, werden bis zur rechtskräftigen Erledigung von den bis anhin zuständigen Behörden nach bisher geltendem Recht beurteilt.

2. Wo zur Erfüllung regionaler Planungsaufgaben noch kein Regionalverband besteht, richten sich Zuständigkeit und Verfahren für regionale Richtpläne weiterhin nach den von der Regierung genehmigten Organisationsstatuten.

← Art. 107 KRG Raumplanungsgesetz für den Kanton Graubünden (KRG) - Gegenstand Art. 108a KRG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (14)

PVG 2010 22 · gr (Art. 108 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 KRG)

Challenge to Cost Distribution in Infrastructure Project Upheld

Applied to establish that the perimeter procedure pending on the entry into force of the KRG had to be continued under the previous procedural rules.

PVG 2010 23 · gr (Art. 108 KRG)

Setback Requirements for New Construction Near Non-Conforming Structures

Cited as part of the transition provisions to determine the applicable law.

A 2009 58 · gr (Art. 108 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 KRG)

Landowner Appeals of Municipal Development Cost Allocation Upheld

Cited in the reasoning regarding the continuation of the perimeter procedure under existing rules due to its pending status when the new KRG came into force, although not explicitly in the final orders, it informs the substantive context leading to the dismissal.

A 2009 31 · gr (art. 108 cpv. 1 cifra 1 LPTC)

Municipal Cost-Sharing for Industrial Urbanization and Parcel Benefit Calculation

Cited in the reasoning to establish the applicable procedural law for ongoing planning procedures upon the entry into force of the new Territorial Planning Law.

A 2009 33 · gr (Art. 108 cpv. 1 cifra 1 LPTC)

Property Owner Challenges Urbanization Cost Allocations for Specific Infrastructure Exemptions

Cited to confirm that pending planning procedures continue under the previously valid communal rules regarding competence and procedure.

R 2006 31 · gr (Art. 94 Abs. 1 in Verbindung mit Art. 107 Abs. 2 Ziff. 6 KRG und Art. 108 KRG e contrario)

Warehouse Conversion Restoration and Fine Appeal

These articles established the basis for ordering the removal of materially non-compliant structures, which was partially overturned based on subsequent proceedings.

R 2007 100 · gr (Art. 108 KRG)

Property Owner Sanctioned for Primary Residence Quota Violation Despite Land Register Omission

Mentioned in the reasoning to establish the applicable material law, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.

R 2006 110 · gr (Art. 108 KRG)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Cellular Mast Due to Unrepublished Substantial Project Modifications

Mentioned by the municipality in point 4a as the potential basis for imposing postage fees, influencing the cost discussion.

R 2006 91 · gr (Art. 108 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 des neuen KRG)

Administrative Court Upholds Conditional Building Permit Approval Despite Procedural Law Challenge

This provision was cited to establish the inapplicability of the coordination provisions of the KRVO because the procedure was initiated under the old law.

PVG 2006 3 · gr (Art. 108 Abs. 2 KRG)

Regional Land-Use Plan Approval Procedure Under New Cantonal Law

This transitional provision was extensively interpreted to confirm that the previous procedural rules still apply where a regional association (Regionalverband) has not yet been established.

V 2006 6 · gr (Art. 108 Abs. 2 KRG)

District Council vs. Regional Master Plan Approval Procedure

This transitional provision was central to the reasoning regarding the continued applicability of existing procedural rules where no formal regional association existed.

R 2006 30 · gr (Art. 108 KRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality on Building Permit Challenge

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 3.d) in connection with Art. 107 Abs. 2 Ziff. 6 KRG regarding the applicable law.

R 2006 32 · gr (Art. 18 der Raumplanungsverordnung für den Kanton Graubünden (BR 801.110; KRVO) i.V.m. Art. 108 Abs.1 Ziffer 1 des kantonalen Raumplanungsgesetzes (BR 801.100; KRG))

Appeal Against Neighborhood Development Plan on Cost Apportionment and Land Deduction

Cited as the legal basis for the publicly displayed neighborhood plan that was the object of the appeal.

R 2006 32 · gr (Art. 18 der Raumplanungsverordnung für den Kanton Graubünden (BR 801.110; KRVO) i.V.m. Art. 108 Abs.1 Ziffer 1 des kantonalen Raumplanungsgesetzes (BR 801.100; KRG))

Appeal on Neighborhood Development Plan Costs, Land Deduction, and Parking Location

This provision identified the final object of appeal: the zoning plan enacted between January 13 and February 2, 2006.