740.000 KJGLCC

CH-GR

Art. 47 Kantonales Jagdgesetz (KJG) - Übertretungen kantonalen Rechts

Strafbestimmungen

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (70 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 47 KJG · Übertretungen kantonalen Rechts

1. Wer vorsätzlich oder fahrlässig gegen dieses Gesetz oder darauf beruhende Erlasse und Verfügungen verstösst, wird mit Busse bis zu 20 000 Franken bestraft, sofern die Übertretung nicht bereits nach Bundesrecht geahndet wird. Versuch und Gehilfenschaft sind strafbar.

2. Soweit das Bundesrecht oder dieses Gesetz nichts anderes bestimmt, richtet sich das Verfahren nach der Strafprozessordnung und der kantonalen Einführungsgesetzgebung.

← Art. 46 KJG Kantonales Jagdgesetz (KJG) - Jagdregal Art. 47a KJG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (41)

SK1 2022 23 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Prosecutor v. Defendant on Hunting Legislation and Tracking Dog Obligation

The acquittal is based on the finding that the defendant did not commit the offense stipulated in this article.

SK1 2019 41 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunting Law Violation and License Withdrawal Appeal

Basis for the imposition of the fine and the conviction for the violation.

SK1 2019 56 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 KJG in Verbindung mit Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunter Acquitted on Initial Shot, Convicted on Prolonged Suffering and Improper Killing Method

Used as the basis for finding the defendant guilty of the infraction concerning the improper killing with a hunting knife.

SK1 2019 56 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 und 2 KJG in Verbindung mit Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunter Acquitted on Initial Shot, Convicted on Prolonged Suffering and Improper Killing Method

Used to acquit the defendant of the infraction regarding the incorrect shot.

SK1 2016 2 · gr (art. 47 cpv. 1 della Legge cantonale sulla caccia (LCC))

Prosecutor v. Individual Regarding Cantonal Hunting Regulation Violation

The appeal regarding the conviction based on this provision was rejected, confirming the acquittal in the lower court (this provision was cited in connection with the PEC violation).

SK1 2016 10 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Cantonal Hunting Law Violation Appeal Regarding Distance of Shot

This provision defines the penalty for violating the Cantonal Hunting Law and was cited in the factual basis for the conviction in order number 2.

SK1 2010 33 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Municipal Clerk Convicted for Hunting Protected Stag

The appellant was found guilty of an infringement of this article concerning violations of cantonal hunting laws, which establishes the penalty basis (fine).

SB 2008 2 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunting Regulation Violation Upheld on Grounds of Unsportsmanlike Conduct

This article defines the penalty (fine) for intentional violation of the KJG provisions, which was confirmed in the original sentence and implicitly in the appeal decision.

SB 2007 3 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunting Regulation Violation: Motorized Vehicle Use for Transit

The appellant was correctly found guilty of an offense in conjunction with this article, which defines the penalty framework.

SB 2007 3 · gr (Art. 17 Abs. 1 und 2 ABzKJG in Verbindung mit Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunting Regulation Violation and Affirmation of Fine

This is the provision under which the appellant was rightfully convicted of the offense by the lower court, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

SB 2006 11 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

State v. [Appellant Name]: Negligent Shooting and Hunting Violations Appeal

This provision, cited in conjunction with Art. 17 lit. a KJG, is part of the basis for affirming the conviction for violating hunting law.

SB 2006 11 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

State v. Appellant (Hunting Violation and Endangerment)

This provision was cited in conjunction with Art. 17 lit. a KJG in the initial conviction, and the violation was upheld.

SB 2005 48 · gr (Art. 17 Abs. 1 und 2 ABzKJG in Verbindung mit Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunters v. State: Unauthorized Vehicle Use to Enlarge Hunting Radius

This is the substantive legal provision under which the appellants were found guilty and whose violation led to the dismissal of their appeals.

SB 2005 48 · gr (Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunters v. State: Unauthorized Vehicle Use to Enlarge Hunting Radius

Cited in the judgment of conviction (orders 1 and 2) as the penalty provision linked to the violation of the ABzKJG.

SB 2005 48 · gr (Art. 17 Abs. 1 und 2 ABzKJG in Verbindung mit Art. 47 Abs. 1 KJG)

Hunting Regulation Violation and Motor Vehicle Use Appeal

The appeal was dismissed because the appellants were correctly found guilty of violating these provisions regarding unauthorized use of motor vehicles in hunting areas.