Art. 21a Einführungsgesetz zur Ausländer- und Asylgesetzgebung des Bundes (EGzAAG) - 5. Weiterzug

VR1 2025 54 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Lawful Extension of Custody Pending Deportation

This provision, in conjunction with Art. 393 ff. StPO, governs the admissibility and procedure for the appeal to the Obergericht.

VR1 2025 16 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG)

Appellant's Challenge to Removal Custody Based on Non-Cooperation and Flight Risk

Cited in relation to the decision on appeal costs.

SK2 2024 67 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG in Verbindung mit Art. 393 Abs. 1 lit. c StPO)

Deportation Detention Upheld Despite Pending Disability Appeal

These provisions establish the basis for filing an appeal against the decision of the summary coercive measures court before the Cantonal Court.

SK2 2024 37 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG)

Detention Extension Upheld Pending Deportation

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the applicability of provisions on criminal appeals (StPO) in this administrative detention appeal.

SK2 2024 1 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG in Verbindung mit Art. 393 Abs. 1 lit. c StPO)

Cantonal Court Upholds Pre-Deportation Detention for Repeated Exclusion Order Violation

These provisions establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal against the decision regarding the custody measure.

SK2 2023 60 · gr (Art. 21a Abs. 2 EGzAAG i.V.m. 426 und 428 StPO)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Lawful Asylum Deportation Detention

Applied to determine that the costs of the appeal proceedings are borne by the appellant due to her complete loss.

SK2 2022 4 · gr (Art. 21a Abs. 2 EGzAAG)

Review of Costs and Compensation Following Partial Unlawful Detention Ruling

Cited in relation to the distribution of costs for the previous cantonal proceedings (SK2 20 9) and in connection with the reimbursement obligation for granted legal aid.

SK2 2022 5 · gr (Art. 21a Abs. 2 EGzAAG)

Compensation for Unlawful Detention and Cost Allocation

Cited in conjunction with Art. 426 and 428 StPO for distributing procedural costs based on success/failure.

SK2 2022 32 · gr (Art. 21a Abs. 2 EGzAAG)

Detention Pending Deportation of Convicted Asylum Seeker Upheld

Used implicitly in the reasoning leading to the rejection of legal aid for the appeal procedure, referencing procedural rules for appeal applicable in this context.

SK2 2021 55 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG in Verbindung mit Art. 393 Abs. 1 lit. c StPO)

Asylum Seeker Detention Pending Deportation Upheld Due to Non-Cooperation

Procedural basis allowing appeal against the decision of the cantonal court for coercive measures.

SK2 2021 14 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG)

Appeal Dismissed for Unsubstantiated Grounds; Detention Upheld Due to Deportation Order and Non-Compliance

Cited in conjunction with Art. 393 lit. c StPO as the procedural basis for the appeal to the Cantonal Court against the decision of the criminal law measure judge.

SK2 2021 4 · gr (Art. 21a Abs. 2 EGzAAG i.V.m. Art. 385 Abs. 1 StPO)

Asylum Custody Challenge on Medical Grounds Dismissed

The court confirmed the inadmissibility/rejection of the appeal based on reasoning related to procedural requirements (which also concerns the substance of the complaint in relation to the reasoning requirement).

SK2 2020 9 · gr (Art. 21a Abs. 2 EGzAAG)

Cantonal Court Upholds Lawful Detention for Identification Interview

Procedural provision governing the applicability of BGG provisions for the appeal, referenced in the context of the appeal process detailed in order 3.

SK2 2020 18 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG)

Detention Pending Deportation Upheld for Convicted Alien

Cited in the reasoning section as the procedural basis allowing an appeal to the Cantonal Court against the decision of the Summary Court regarding coercive measures.

SK2 2019 67 · gr (Art. 21a EGzAAG)

Custody Extension Appeal: Acceleration Duty and Interpreter Rights in Deportation Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning, establishing the basis for the appeal against the decision of the Criminal Procedure Court (though not directly used in the final orders 1-3.3, it is part of the procedural framework mentioned when discussing the appeal itself).