542.100
KPVGLAMRP
CH-GR
Art. 19 Gesetz über die Krankenversicherung und die Prämienverbilligung (KPVG) - Rechtsmittel
Prämienverbilligung - Organisation und Verfahren
Art. 19 KPVG · Rechtsmittel
1. Gegen Verfügungen der AHV-Ausgleichskasse kann innert 30 Tagen seit Zustellung bei der gleichen Instanz eine schriftliche und begründete Einsprache erhoben werden. Das Einspracheverfahren ist kostenlos. Es besteht kein Anspruch auf Parteientschädigung.
2. Gegen Einspracheentscheide der AHV-Ausgleichskasse kann innert 30 Tagen seit deren Mitteilung beim Obergericht schriftlich Beschwerde eingereicht werden.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (30)
S 2021 72 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Appeal (2019)
Cited in the reasoning to establish the legal basis for filing an appeal against the rejection decision, which was confirmed as a valid appeal object.
S 2021 17 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Appeal Against Denial of Health Insurance Premium Reductions After Deregistration
This provision was cited in the reasoning to confirm the court's jurisdiction and the timeliness of the appeal, although it does not explicitly appear in the final numbered orders.
S 2020 118 · gr (art. 19 cpv. 2 LAMRP)
Dentist Challenges Retroactive Health Insurance Premium Reduction Based on Spouse's Foreign Income
This procedural rule, along with LGA, established the competence of the Administrative Tribunal to hear the appeal.
S 2019 109 · gr (art. 19 cpv. 2 LAMRP)
Retired Person Denied LAMal Premium Reduction Due to Military Insurance Status
Cited in the considerations to establish the Tribunal's jurisdiction, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
S 2019 88 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Appeal Regarding Individual Premium Reduction Based on Preceding Year's Tax Data
Cited to confirm that the contested decision (Einspracheentscheid) was a suitable object of appeal to the Administrative Court.
S 2018 92 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Individual Premium Reduction Denial Due to Late Filing
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction over the administrative appeal decision regarding premium subsidy.
S 2017 154 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness
The court relied on this article (in conjunction with procedural provisions) to confirm that the appeal was filed late, leading to non-admission.
S 2017 154 · gr (Art. 49 Abs. 2 lit. b VRG i.V.m. Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimeliness
Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction to review the appeal against the objection decision.
S 2015 80 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Claimant Barred from Retroactive Premium Reduction Benefits Due to Missed Statutory Deadline
Cited to establish that the decision being appealed was a valid subject for an appeal to the Administrative Court.
S 2009 111 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 1 Satz 1 KPVG)
Recalculation and Appeal Deadlines for Individual Premium Subsidy
Cited as the procedural basis for the finding that the appeal (Einsprache) was untimely, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.
S 2009 57 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 1 KPVG)
Taxpayer Fails to Timely Object to 2008 Individual Premium Reduction Despite Subsequent Favorable Tax Assessment
The non-adherence to the 30-day deadline stipulated here is the basis for rejecting the appeal.
S 2007 165 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Military Insured Employee v. Denial of Individual Premium Reduction
Cited in conjunction with Art. 72 Abs. 1 VRG as the basis for not levying court costs.
S 2007 147 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG)
Rejection of Re-evaluation of 2004 Individual Premium Reduction Upheld
Cited in conjunction with Art. 72 Abs. 1 VRG to establish that court costs are not to be levied in this type of appeal.
S 2007 47 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 2 KPVG in Verbindung mit Art. 72 Abs. 1 VRG)
Insured Person v. Authority Regarding Reinstatement of Premium Subsidy Objection Deadline
Cited in the dispositive to establish that no court costs are to be levied for the appeal proceedings concerning IPV.
S 2007 88 · gr (Art. 19 Abs. 1 KPVG)
Claimant Barred from Recalculating Premium Reductions Due to Untimely Appeal
The lack of recourse within the 30-day period according to this article led to the formal legal force of the decisions.