370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 6c Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Entscheid
Allgemeine Grundsätze des Verfahrens - Verfahrensleitung, Ausstand, Fristen und elektronischer Rechtsverkehr - Ausstand
Art. 6c VRG · Entscheid
1. Ist der Ausstand streitig, entscheidet
a) * die oder der Vorsitzende des in der Hauptsache zuständigen Gerichts in Ausstandsfällen von weiteren Gerichtspersonen;
abis) * die Stellvertreterin oder der Stellvertreter der oder des Vorsitzenden in Ausstandsfällen der oder des Vorsitzenden;
b) * die Kollegialbehörde in Abwesenheit der betroffenen Person in Ausstandsfällen ihrer Mitglieder;
c) die Departementsvorsteherin oder der Departementsvorsteher in Ausstandsfällen von Angestellten des jeweiligen Departements;
d) die vorgesetzte Behörde in den übrigen Fällen.
2. Die gleiche Behörde entscheidet, welche Verfahrens- oder Prozesshandlungen zu wiederholen sind, wenn ein bereits bestehender Ausstandsgrund erst nachträglich bekannt wird.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (8)
U 2017 110 · gr (Art. 6c Abs. 1 lit. d VRG)
Canton Expropriation Commission Disqualification Appeal Dismissed
Used to establish the administrative court's jurisdiction to rule on the challenge when all commission members are challenged.
R 2016 40 · gr (Art. 6a - 6c VRG)
Alpine Farming Cooperative Exclusion and Fine Unlawful Due to Lack of Legal Basis and Insufficient Justification
Cited as the provisions governing recusation in the context of municipal law according to Art. 22 para. 3 GG.
R 2013 133 · gr (Art. 6c VRG)
Inn Renovation Permit Appeal Regarding Setback Violations
Cited in the reasoning as part of the applicable procedural law for determining bias.
R 2011 68 · gr (Art. 6c VRG)
Retirement Center Expansion Permit Upheld Against Building Code Objections
Cited in reasoning regarding the procedural rules for recusal applicable to the municipal executive acting as a review body for objections.
PVG 2011 20 · gr (Art. 6c Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Building Permit Recusal Proceedings: Administrative vs. Judicial Standards
The court found that the municipal executive violated this provision by not excluding the mayor from the decision on the objection when a conflict of interest was present.
A 2011 13 · gr (Art. 6a - 6c VRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality on Second Home Tax Procedural Violations
These articles determine the rules for disqualification that the Government, acting in its judicial capacity, must follow.
A 2011 13 · gr (Art. 6c VRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality on Second Home Tax Procedural Violations
The previous decision on the motion for disqualification against Council Member X was rendered in violation of this article because the affected member was present during deliberations.
R 2011 41 · gr (Art. 6c Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Improper Participation in Recusal and Permit Decisions
The court relied on this provision to find that the cantonal board committed an error by not deciding on the request for recusal in the absence of the concerned member, which led to the annulment of the decisions.