370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 61 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Urteil

Verfahren vor Obergericht - Verfassungsbeschwerde

Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (98 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 61 VRG · Urteil

1. Das Obergericht hebt den angefochtenen Erlass oder Entscheid auf, soweit er verfassungs- oder gesetzwidrig ist.

2. Es ordnet gleichzeitig die angemessene Veröffentlichung dieses Entscheids an.

3. Soweit die Verfassungsverletzung nicht anders behoben werden kann, erlässt das Obergericht die erforderlichen Anordnungen.

← Art. 60 VRG Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Kantonale Behörden Art. 62 VRG →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (10)

SV2 2025 7 · gr (Art. 61 lit. f VRG)

Appeal Regarding Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Imputed Asset Transfers

Cited regarding the right to free legal assistance where warranted by the circumstances.

VR1 2024 1006 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRG)

Municipal Council Zoning Initiative Validity Appeal

Procedural basis for allowing the appeal and annulling the challenged resolution.

V 2022 5 · gr (art. 61 cpv. 3 LGA)

Municipal Election Candidacy Deadline Dispute

Used to order that the current municipal council elected on November 28, 2022, continues its mandate until the new council takes office, for reasons of legal certainty.

V 2022 7 · gr (art. 61 cpv. 3 LGA)

Communal Election Challenge Regarding Mandatory Candidacy Deadline

This provision was cited in the reasoning section (Consid. 5) justifying the order that the current municipal council continues its mandate until the new one takes office, which is implicitly confirmed in the operative part regarding the new elections.

V 2014 9 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRG)

Hotel Owner v. Municipality Regarding Traffic Regulation Infringing Economic Freedom

The court noted its inability to grant the appellant's alternative request to adapt the regulation based on this article.

V 2014 9 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRG)

Hotel Operator v. Municipality on Traffic Restrictions and Economic Freedom

The court noted it was not possible to grant the subsidiary motion to adapt the regulation, referencing this procedural rule.

V 2012 9 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRG)

Parents v. Canton on School Language Transition Timing

Cited when explaining the primarily cassatory nature of the constitutional appeal, meaning the court would typically just annul the contested provision if successful.

V 2012 9 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRG)

Parents v. Canton on School Language Transition Timing

Cited when explaining that the court would only issue necessary orders in exceptional cases where a constitutional violation could not otherwise be remedied.

V 2012 9 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRG)

School Language Transition Statute Challenge

Cited when explaining that the nature of the constitutional appeal is primarily cassatory, meaning the court would simply annul the contested provision if upheld.

V 2012 9 · gr (Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRG)

School Language Transition Statute Challenge

Cited when explaining that the court only issues necessary orders in exceptional cases where a constitutional violation cannot be remedied otherwise.