370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 56 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Urteilsbefugnis
Verfahren vor Obergericht - Verwaltungsgerichtliche Beschwerde - Verfahren
Art. 56 VRG · Urteilsbefugnis
1. Das Obergericht ist unter Vorbehalt abweichender gesetzlicher Bestimmungen an die Anträge der Parteien gebunden.
2. Ist das Obergericht nicht an die Anträge der Parteien gebunden, kann es einen Entscheid zu Ungunsten der beschwerdeführenden Partei ändern oder dieser mehr zusprechen, als sie verlangt hat. In diesem Fall ist den Parteien vorher Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme sowie zum Rückzug der Beschwerde zu geben.
3. Hebt das Obergericht den angefochtenen Entscheid auf, entscheidet es selbst oder weist die Sache zum neuen Entscheid zurück.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (57)
VR3 2021 35 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Alpine Hut Window Design Dispute and Restoration Order
Applied reformatorily to newly set the administrative fine (Busse) based on the court's assessment of the case.
U 2024 39 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 und Art. 73 Abs. 3 VRG)
Healthcare Institution v. Canton: Review of COVID-19 Patient Transfer Cost Coverage
Basis for remitting the matter to the opposing party to re-rule on the costs of the previous administrative appeal proceedings.
R 2023 38 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Challenger v. Neighborhood Plan Amendment (Solar Panel Color Restriction)
Applied by the court to decide the case itself (reformatory decision) after partial annulment of the contested decision.
R 2024 9 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Against Municipality's Uniform Balcony Solar Installation Requirement
Cited to acknowledge the court's binding nature regarding the parties' requests, which determined the scope of the final orders.
R 2024 9 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal Against Municipality's Uniform Balcony Solar Installation Requirement
Used to justify the court's decision to grant the building permit directly (reformatory decision).
R 2021 74 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Appeal Against Barn Rebuilding Permit Upheld Due to Expired Heritage Rights and Aesthetic Non-Compliance
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the admissibility of the alternative petition (Eventualbegehren).
R 2024 42 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Reapportionment of Procedural Costs Following Partial Success on Appeal
Cited as the basis for remitting the case to the Government for new determination of costs and compensation consequences of the prior administrative appeal proceeding PB _____.
U 2024 15 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG)
Child Support Advance Termination Following Adoption Retroactivity Dispute
Applied to confirm that the court is bound by the applicant's requests, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
U 2023 59 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Art. 7 ff. und Art. 39 Abs. 1 VRG sowie Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 38 VRG)
Road Surfacing Procurement Cancellation Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness and formal correctness of the appeal.
U 2022 27 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Afghan National v. Denial of Hardship Residence Permit on Integration Grounds
The court decided to settle the case itself (reformatorischer Entscheid) when granting the appeal, based on this provision.
U 2021 91 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Cantonal Department Settlement Agreements Transparency Delay Pending Federal Review
The court used this provision to justify amending the contested decision itself instead of remitting it for a new decision, for reasons of procedural economy.
R 2022 111 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Federal Supreme Court Remand on Cost Allocation Following Area Plan Overturn
Basis for remitting the matter concerning costs and compensation in the planning appeal procedure (PB Z.1._____) back to the Regierung.
R 2022 78 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Municipality v. Construction Company: Revision of Cost Allocation in Administrative Proceedings
Cited as the legal basis allowing the administrative court to decide reformatorily (decide itself) on the outstanding cost/compensation issues.
R 2022 79 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Municipality v. Administrative Court: Cost Reallocation on Federal Remand
Applied to justify the court's decision to rule directly on the merits of the costs instead of remitting the case to the municipality.
U 2022 65 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)
Tax Administration Repayment Obligation vs. Appellant's Subsistence Minimum and Legitimate Expectation
The court decided to issue a reformative decision based on this article.