370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 52 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Frist
Verfahren vor Obergericht - Verwaltungsgerichtliche Beschwerde - Voraussetzungen
Art. 52 VRG · Frist
1. Die Beschwerde ist schriftlich innert 30 Tagen seit Mitteilung des angefochtenen Entscheids beim Obergericht einzureichen.
2. Die Frist zur Anfechtung von verfahrensleitenden Anordnungen und vorsorglichen Massnahmen beträgt zehn Tage.
3. Für stimmberechtigte Mitglieder einer Körperschaft gilt bei Versammlungsbeschlüssen der Tag der Beschlussfassung als Tag der Kenntnisnahme.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (335)
VR1 2025 18 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c und Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipal Traffic Restriction on Minor Access Route Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.3) as the procedural rules confirming the appeal was timely and formally correct, which led to the decision to hear the case (entry into merits).
VR3 2025 32 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing Regarding Retroactive Ancillary Building Permits Outside Building Zone
Cited in the reasoning concerning the 30-day deadline for filing the appeal, which determined the inadmissibility order.
VR3 2024 41 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 und Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)
Cantonal Watercourse Zoning Revision Upheld Against Property Owner Objection
Cited in conjunction with Art. 102 KRG to confirm that the appeal was timely and admissible for a decision on the merits.
VR3 2018 81 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Cellular Antenna Permit Denial Over Aesthetic Concerns Overturned on Balancing Test
This provision was cited in the reasoning section concerning the timeliness of the appeal, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive) 1-5.
VR1 2025 41 · gr (Art. 52 VRG)
Appeal Rejection Upheld Due to Procedural Defects and Untimely Submission
The court confirmed that the appeal was filed within the formal and time limits based on this provision.
VR1 2025 40 · gr (Art. 42 i.V.m. Art. 50 und Art. 52 Abs. 2 VRG)
Appeal Against Denial of Public Transport Contract Disclosure Dismissed
These provisions were cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 1) as the basis for appealing the challenged procedural decision, but they do not appear in the dispositive orders, so they are excluded based on the rules.
VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed
Cited to confirm the appeal was submitted within the required time limit.
VR3 2023 47 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Against Partial Revision of Local Development Plan for Hotel Resort Expansion
Cited regarding the timely filing of the appeal (although this article appears in the reasoning on admissibility, it is not explicitly cited in the final orders 1-4).
VR1 2025 5 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipal Road Traffic Restriction Upheld
Cited to confirm the appeal was filed in the correct form.
SV1 2024 1076 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Social Assistance Deduction for Misspent Inheritance Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was filed within the correct time and form, which is a prerequisite for entering the merits.
U 2024 50 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Responsibility for Social Assistance Following Majority in Supported Housing for Vocational Training
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was compliant with formal requirements, although not explicitly named in the dispositive.
VR3 2022 19 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Farmer's Agricultural Enterprise Status Appeal Regarding Cantonal Minimum Land Requirement
Cited to confirm that the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit.
U 2024 58 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Support Domicile Determination Following Relocation and Incarceration
Procedural basis confirming the appeal was filed in the prescribed form.
VR3 2024 3 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Farm Secondary Use Zoning Appeal on Procedural Grounds
Cited to confirm the appeal was filed within the correct time limit.
A 2024 10 · gr (Art. 52 VRG)
Landlord Not Solidarily Liable for Tenant's Unpaid Electricity Bills Due to Lack of Timely Notice
Cited in the reasoning concerning the formal admissibility of the appeal, which was implicitly confirmed by entering the merits.