Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 51 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Beschwerdegründe und Rechtsbegehren

Verfahren vor Obergericht - Verwaltungsgerichtliche Beschwerde - Voraussetzungen
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (98 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 51 VRG · Beschwerdegründe und Rechtsbegehren

1. Mit der Beschwerde können geltend gemacht werden

a) Rechtsverletzungen einschliesslich Überschreitung oder Missbrauch des Ermessens;

b) unrichtige oder unvollständige Feststellung des rechtserheblichen Sachverhalts.

2. Die Parteien können Rechtsbegehren, die sie im vorinstanzlichen Verfahren gestellt haben, nicht ausdehnen.

3. Neue Tatsachenbehauptungen und Beweisanträge sind zulässig.

← Art. 50 VRG Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Kantonale Behörden Art. 52 VRG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (192)

VR3 2018 81 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VRG)
Cellular Antenna Permit Denial Over Aesthetic Concerns Overturned on Balancing Test
This provision was cited in the reasoning section concerning the standard of review, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive) 1-5.
VR3 2018 81 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 3 VRG)
Cellular Antenna Permit Denial Over Aesthetic Concerns Overturned on Balancing Test
This provision was cited in the reasoning section regarding the admissibility of new evidence, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive) 1-5.
VR1 2024 91 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VRG)
Challenge to Municipality's Refusal to Recuse President Not Appealable Administrative Decision
Cited to exclude claims in the appeal that were not raised in the previous instance (the request concerning the impartiality of the municipal president regarding property Nr. Z.2._____ and related properties).
VR3 2023 47 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Against Partial Revision of Local Development Plan for Hotel Resort Expansion
Cited to define the scope of review (Kognition) of the Obergericht (although this article appears in the reasoning on scope of review, it is not explicitly cited in the final orders 1-4).
VR3 2023 117 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VRG)
Landowners v. Municipality: Annulment of Partial Neighborhood Plan Revision Initiation
Cited implicitly, as the court reviewed the factual and legal situation freely, which allowed it to waive remittal for the violation of the right to be heard.
U 2024 51 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VRG)
Driving License Revocation for Obscured Vision and Prior Offenses
Cited to confirm the scope of review (Kognition) concerning legal errors and factual findings.
A 2023 7 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VRG)
Limited Liability Company Tax Assessment Appeal Dismissed Over Work in Progress Write-Down
Used to declare that the appeal could not address the issue of capitalizing the write-off/value adjustment as it was not raised in the objection proceedings.
VR3 2023 120 · gr (art. 51 cpv. 2 LGA)
Appeal Against Building Permit for Dust Mitigation Paving
Cited by the Court to explain why the substantive request concerning the restoration of legality (Art. 94 LPTC) was inadmissible due to the principle of the hierarchical path.
R 2023 78 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Over Building Expansion Qualification Based on Unlawful Prior Use
Cited in the reasoning (E.3.3) in relation to the Court's unlimited jurisdiction to review the facts, which allowed for the healing of the procedural defect without remission.
U 2024 11 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipality Snow Removal Permit Denial Upheld Despite Procedural Flaw
Cited as the basis for the court's unrestricted cognitive power, which allowed it to heal the procedural defect instead of remitting the case.
U 2024 23 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 1 lit. a und b VRG)
Transport Company v. Municipality on Truck Traffic Restriction
Cited to define the scope of the court's review regarding legality and factual findings in the proportionality assessment.
R 2024 6 · gr (art. 51 cpv. 1 lett. b LGA)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Ancillary Structure Permit
The decision was annulled and the case referred back due to incomplete and inaccurate factual findings (Art. 51 para. 1 let. b LGA).
R 2022 18 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit in Preservation Area Dismissed Based on Access Dispute
Cited as part of the reasoning to justify not entering into the merits of certain claims made in the appeal that exceeded the scope of the initial objection proceedings.
U 2024 26 · gr (Art. 51 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Post-Divorce Residency Permit
Cited to define the scope of review (Kognition) of the Administrative Court regarding the appeal.
R 2021 74 · gr (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VRG)
Appeal Against Barn Rebuilding Permit Upheld Due to Expired Heritage Rights and Aesthetic Non-Compliance
Cited in the reasoning to dismiss the objection regarding the expansion of legal requests during the appeal procedure.