Art. 50 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Legitimation

VR1 2025 19 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

School Transfer Due to Parental Conflict Upheld

Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.13) as the basis for determining the appellants' legitimacy to file the appeal, which the court ultimately confirmed was met.

VR1 2025 21 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Traffic Restriction on Access Road

This article was used in the reasoning concerning the appellant's standing to appeal, although it does not appear in the final dispositive orders.

VR3 2024 81 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Building Permit Conditions for Window Replacement on Historic Building

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the appellant's standing to appeal (legitimiert).

VR3 2024 24 · gr (Art. 50 Abs. 1 VRG)

Property Owner v. Forest Service Road Improvement Project

The court confirmed the appellant's standing to appeal based on this provision.

VR1 2025 41 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Appeal Rejection Upheld Due to Procedural Defects and Untimely Submission

The court confirmed the appellant's standing to appeal based on this provision.

VR1 2025 40 · gr (Art. 42 i.V.m. Art. 50 und Art. 52 Abs. 2 VRG)

Appeal Against Denial of Public Transport Contract Disclosure Dismissed

These provisions were cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 1) as the basis for appealing the challenged procedural decision, but they do not appear in the dispositive orders, so they are excluded based on the rules.

VR3 2024 64 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Neighboring Owner Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed on Height and Aesthetics

This provision on standing was mentioned in the reasoning section that confirmed admissibility, but it was not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive) concerning the judgment itself, therefore it is excluded based on the strict rule.

VR3 2023 42 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Appealability of Interlocutory Order on Scope of Building Procedure

The court did not enter a judgment because the appellant lacked a legally protected interest in having the contested matter decided in a separate procedure.

VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed

Cited to establish the appellant's standing (legitimation) to appeal the decision.

VR3 2023 47 · gr (Art. 50 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appeal Against Partial Revision of Local Development Plan for Hotel Resort Expansion

Cited to confirm the standing/locus standi of the appellants (although this article appears in the reasoning on standing, it is not explicitly cited in the final orders 1-4).

VR3 2025 2 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Appellant Lacked Standing to Challenge Building Permit for Office Expansion at Shooting Range

The appeal was not admitted due to the appellant's lack of standing (Beschwerdebefugnis).

VR1 2025 5 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Municipal Road Traffic Restriction Upheld

Used by the court to confirm the active legitimacy of the appellants to file the appeal.

VR3 2023 107 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Challenge to Neighborhood Planning Initiation for Underground Parking Dismissed

Cited as the standard for determining the legitimacy to appeal (Beschwerdelegitimation), although ultimately applied to dismiss one appeal (VR3 23 110).

VR1 2024 92 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Municipality Violated Procurement Rules by Altering Price Evaluation in Zoning Contract Award

Cited in the reasoning section (E. 1.3) to define who is entitled to lodge an appeal before the Court.

VR1 2024 71 · gr (Art. 50 VRG)

Wolf Culling Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing

The appeal was not entertained because the applicants lacked the standing to appeal as required by this article.