Art. 42 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Prozessbeschwerde

VR1 2025 40 · gr (Art. 42 i.V.m. Art. 50 und Art. 52 Abs. 2 VRG)

Appeal Against Denial of Public Transport Contract Disclosure Dismissed

These provisions were cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 1) as the basis for appealing the challenged procedural decision, but they do not appear in the dispositive orders, so they are excluded based on the rules.

VR3 2023 113 · gr (Art. 42 VRG)

Property Owner v. Municipality (Lakeside Path Renovation Permit)

Cited as the procedural basis for the applicant's right to appeal the interlocutory decision on suspension, which was not exercised.

R 2023 71 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appeal on Forest Classification Expert Report Inclusion

Cited in the reasoning to establish the right to appeal the procedural order, relevant to the outcome of the procedural issue being judged.

R 2023 63 · gr (Art. 42 Abs. 1 i.V.m. 52 Abs. 2 VRG)

Slope Safety Versus Demolition Stay Appeal

These provisions govern the deadline for appealing procedural orders, justifying the admissibility of the process appeal in the reasoning.

R 2022 64 · gr (Art. 42 i.V.m. Art. 50 VRG)

Cantonal Road Expansion Precautionary Measures Upheld Against Appeal Seeking Suspension

Cited in the reasoning to establish the admissibility of challenging procedural rulings before the Administrative Court, although not explicitly in the dispositive, it underlies the context of the review.

R 2021 101 · gr (Art. 42 und Art. 52 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Art. 50 VRG)

Appeal Regarding Revocation of Suspensive Effect on Building Permit Challenge

These procedural provisions were cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the challenge against the procedural order, though not directly in the dispositive orders 1-5, thus they are excluded based on the strict rule for inclusion (only provisions cited in the dispositive).

U 2020 71 · gr (Art. 42 VRG)

Property Owners' Access Rights and Suspension of Traffic Restriction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the deadline for the procedural appeal.

U 2020 47 · gr (Art. 42 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Procurement Document Access Dispute and Cost Allocation

This article is cited in the reasoning to establish that the decision regarding the scope of access to files is a reviewable procedural decision via process appeal (Prozessbeschwerde), even though the procedural aspect itself (appealability) is not repeated in the dispositive.

R 2020 24 · gr (Art. 42 VRG)

Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Stay Pending Precautionary Protection Decision

The legal remedy was accepted as a procedural appeal (Prozessbeschwerde) based on this article.

ZK2 2019 87 · gr (Art. 42 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Appeal Against Procedural Cost Advance Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction; Legal Representative Sanctioned

Cited in the reasoning to justify the lack of jurisdiction, but the ultimate decision (Order 1) relies on inadmissibility due to lack of jurisdiction, which is the main ground for non-entry into the merits.

ZK2 2019 89 · gr (Art. 42 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Cantonal Court Dismisses Administrative Appeal Jurisdictionally, Imposing Costs on Appellant's Counsel

Cited in the reasoning as the rule establishing that administrative court procedural orders must be appealed directly to the administrative court, leading to the non-admission of the appeal on jurisdictional grounds.

ZK2 2019 87 · gr (Art. 42 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Attorney Sanctioned for Filing Appeal in Wrong Court Regarding Health Insurance Premium Cost Deposit

Cited in the reasoning regarding jurisdiction, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-5).

ZK2 2019 89 · gr (Art. 42 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG))

Appellant's Challenge to Procedural Order Dismissed; Legal Representative Sanctioned for Procedural Error

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the cantonal court is not competent to rule on administrative court procedural orders, which is the underlying issue leading to non-admission.

R 2017 27 · gr (Art. 42 i.V.m. Art. 50 VRG)

Noise Control Standing Challenge

Cited as the basis for the possibility of appealing procedural decisions, although the appeal was ultimately dismissed based on lack of standing.

R 2016 70 · gr (Art. 42 VRG)

Appeal Moot Due to Irreparable Demolition Loss

Cited in conjunction with Art. 50 VRG regarding the admissibility of challenging procedural orders before the Administrative Court.