370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
Art. 39 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Gerichtsferien
Verfahren vor Obergericht - Allgemeine Vorschriften - Formvorschriften und Verfahrensleitung
Art. 39 VRG · Gerichtsferien
1. Gesetzliche und gerichtlich bestimmte Fristen stehen still
a) vom siebten Tag vor Ostern bis und mit dem siebten Tag nach Ostern;
b) vom 15. Juli bis und mit dem 15. August;
c) vom 18. Dezember bis und mit dem 2. Januar.
2. Davon ausgenommen sind Verfahren
a) die durch besondere Verfügung der Instruktionsrichterin oder des Instruktionsrichters für dringlich erklärt werden;
b) für die eine abweichende gesetzliche Regelung besteht.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (39)
VR1 2025 18 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c und Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipal Traffic Restriction on Minor Access Route Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.3) as the procedural rules confirming the appeal was timely and formally correct, which led to the decision to hear the case (entry into merits).
U 2024 58 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Support Domicile Determination Following Relocation and Incarceration
Procedural basis confirming the appeal was filed in the prescribed form.
VR3 2024 3 · gr (Art. 39 Abs.1 lit. c VRG)
Farm Secondary Use Zoning Appeal on Procedural Grounds
Cited to confirm the appeal was filed within the correct formal requirements.
R 2024 7 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Appeal Dismissed for Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Bathroom
Cited regarding the formal requirements for submitting the appeal.
R 2023 78 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Over Building Expansion Qualification Based on Unlawful Prior Use
Cited as a procedural basis for the admissibility of the appeal (timeliness).
R 2024 31 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Municipal Denial of Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Habitation Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (E.1.1) as part of the timely and proper filing requirements, which underpins the court's decision to proceed.
U 2024 26 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Post-Divorce Residency Permit
Cited in conjunction with other procedural articles to confirm the admissibility of the appeal as it concerned a final decision (which it ultimately did not find to be the case, but it was cited regarding admissibility).
U 2023 59 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Art. 7 ff. und Art. 39 Abs. 1 VRG sowie Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 38 VRG)
Road Surfacing Procurement Cancellation Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness and formal correctness of the appeal.
U 2023 65 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Mother v. Social Integration Requirement Due to Health and Family Burden
Cited as part of the formal assessment confirming the admissibility of the appeal.
R 2022 71 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Luxury Home Primary Residence Use Validated Against Second Home Circumvention Claim
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was filed in a timely manner.
U 2022 67 · gr (art. 52 cpv. 1 i.c.c. art. 39 cpv. 1 lett. b LGA)
Abolition of Municipal Engineer Position Upheld Despite Termination Challenge
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness of the appeal, which is relevant context for the admissibility ruling.
R 2021 1 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Challenge to Neighborhood Development Plan Approval Dismissed on Zoning Finality and Environmental Grounds
Used implicitly in the reasoning to account for court holidays when determining the full admissibility of the appeal.
R 2020 104 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Municipality Refusal to Lift Primary Residence Obligation Upheld in Condominium Case
Cited as procedural basis for the timely filing of the appeal.
R 2021 78 · gr (Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Appeal Dismissed: Building Permits Upheld Against Neighbor Objections on Zoning and Heritage Grounds
Cited in reasoning (E.1) regarding the suspension of deadlines during court holidays (Fristenstillstand).
U 2022 1 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c und Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)
Municipality Social Assistance Cut Without Prior Formal Order
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the appeal was filed within the time limits and in the correct form, which supported entering the appeal (though not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders 1-5, it supported the procedural finding that allowed the court to proceed to the merits of the appeal).