370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 33 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Rechtsschriften
Verfahren vor kantonalen Verwaltungsbehörden - Verwaltungsbeschwerde - Verfahren
Art. 33 VRG · Rechtsschriften
1. Rechtsschriften sind in einer Amtssprache abzufassen und haben einen Antrag und eine Begründung zu enthalten. Sie sind unter Beilage der verfügbaren Beweismittel und des angefochtenen Entscheids einzureichen. Weitere Beweismittel sind genau zu bezeichnen.
2. Rechtsschriften in Papierform sind zu unterzeichnen und im Doppel einzureichen.
3. Genügt eine Eingabe den gesetzlichen Erfordernissen nicht oder ist sie in unziemlicher Form abgefasst, unleserlich oder unnötig umfangreich, wird eine angemessene Frist zur Behebung des Mangels angesetzt mit der Androhung, dass auf die Eingabe sonst nicht eingetreten werde.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (12)
A 2018 44 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)
Communal Tax Objection Rejection Upheld Due to Unsigned Fax Submission
This article was cited in the reasoning section concerning granting time limits for correcting defects, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the final dispositive orders (1-4).
U 2017 20 · gr (Art. 33 VRG)
Property Valuation Appeal Regarding Primary Residence Restriction and Market Conditions
Cited as the procedural rule requiring the appellant to specify in the appeal grounds which points of the contested decision are challenged and why.
U 2017 20 · gr (Art. 33 VRG)
Taxpayers Appeal Property Valuation Based on Future Legislation and Existing Residence Status
Cited in the reasoning to establish the requirement for the appealing party to specify objections in the statement of appeal (though this is a general procedural rule discussed in the considerations, not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders, it is retained here as it informs the admissibility/handling of the appeal basis).
R 2015 62 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)
Landholder v. Alpine Cooperative and Municipal Board (Grazing Rights Allocation)
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the procedural requirement for the municipal board to set a deadline for a missing signature, which is relevant to the outcome of the appeal.
U 2014 26 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)
Appellant v. Department Regarding Cost Recovery for Refused Vaccination
The court found that the administrative authority should have granted the appellant a grace period to remedy the formal deficiency in the appeal application.
U 2014 26 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 3 VRG)
Departmental Refusal to Rule on Appeal Annulled Due to Improper Abuse of Process Finding
The court used the failure to grant a deadline for rectification under this provision as the basis for overturning the challenged non-entry decision and remitting the case.
SK2 2010 47 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)
Appeal Against Refusal to Investigate Misappropriation and Theft: Statute of Limitations Confirmed
Cited in the reasoning confirming the timeliness and proper form of the appeal, which is a procedural prerequisite.
SK2 2009 35 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)
Appeal on Battery Dismissal Remanded for Reconsideration of Evidence
Cited in the reasoning defining the required form and content of the appeal (Considerand 1).
BK 2008 35 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)
Public Prosecutor v. Negligent Horse Owner Regarding Child Injury
Cited in the reasoning concerning the formal requirements for filing the appeal (request and reasoning).
BK 2007 48 · gr (art. 33 cpv. 1 e 2 LGA)
Prosecutor v. Horse Owner (Negligence)
Cited in the context of the formal requirements for the appeal (request and grounds/evidence).
BK 2007 37 · gr (Art. 33 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)
Appellant v. Prosecutor (Fraud Dismissal Appeal)
Cited regarding the formal requirements for filing the appeal (motion and justification).
PKG 2008 17 · gr (Art. 178 Abs. 1 StPO in Verbindung mit Art. 33 ff.VRG)
Administrative Penalty Order Objection: Public Hearing Right in Subsequent Judicial Appeal
The court cited this provision as the legal basis for the lack of obligation to hold a public hearing before the administrative authority (DJSG).