Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 16 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Rechtliches Gehör

Allgemeine Grundsätze des Verfahrens - Rechte und Pflichten der Beteiligten
Originalquelle öffnen Gesamter Erlass (98 Artikel) Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Art. 16 VRG · Rechtliches Gehör

1. Die Behörde hat den von einem Entscheid Betroffenen Gelegenheit zur schriftlichen oder mündlichen Stellungnahme zu geben.

2. Sie kann insbesondere darauf verzichten, wenn sofortiges Handeln notwendig ist.

← Art. 15 VRG Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Kantonale Behörden Art. 17 VRG →

Fragen Sie sich, wie diese Gesetzesbestimmung auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Erlass zusammen mit Rechtsprechung, Kommentaren und verwandten Gesetzesbestimmungen in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (27)

U 2023 59 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Road Surfacing Procurement Cancellation Upheld
Cited in the context of the appellant's rejected claim regarding the violation of the right to be heard.
PVG 2023 9 · gr (Art. 16 cpv. 1 LGA)
Complainants Lack Standing to Appeal Preliminary Fact-Finding Decision
This article was invoked in the reasoning to define the scope of the right to be heard and the right to reply, although the appeal was ultimately declared inadmissible on standing.
R 2022 1 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Solar Installation Permit Denial Upheld Despite Procedural Defect
Cited as the cantonal equivalent of the constitutional right to a hearing, which was a central point of contention in the appeal.
R 2021 9 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit: Jurisdiction Over Parking vs. Water/Sewage Fees
Cited as the cantonal basis for the right to be heard, which was initially examined as a potential procedural violation.
U 2019 10 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 VRG)
Social Assistance Housing Cost Cap Reconsideration Refusal Upheld
Cited in the reasoning as the statutory basis requiring authorities to grant parties the opportunity to state their case.
R 2018 39 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Appeal of Municipal Building Permit Regarding Apartment Expansion Due to Procedural Due Process Violation
Cantonal provision guaranteeing the right to be heard, cited in conjunction with Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV for granting the partial appeal.
R 2017 36 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Appeal Against Antenna Mast Expansion Permit Approval Upheld Despite Minor Procedural Error
Procedural rule referenced in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard before the administrative authority.
R 2017 14 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Property Owners v. Municipality: Hotel Permit Conditions and Procedural Rights
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, requiring opportunity for comment before a decision.
R 2015 59 · gr (Art. 16 ff. VRG)
Zoning Revision and Access Road Challenge Dismissed
Cited as the cantonal basis for the right to be heard (rechtliches Gehör).
R 2015 22 · gr (Art. 16 ff. VRG)
Municipality v. Resident Regarding Recycling Container Placement
Cited in the reasoning as the cantonal basis for the principle of the right to be heard.
JAK 2014 30 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissal Based on Missed Deadline Despite Illness
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, which the court examined as a potential ground for nullity, but did not feature in the dispositive orders.
JAK 2014 30 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Filing and Insufficient Justification for Missed Deadline
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard (rechtliches Gehör).
U 2014 29 · gr (Art. 16 VRG)
Social Assistance Appeals: Business Liquidation and Benefit Reduction
Cited regarding the procedural requirement for granting the right to be heard (opportunity for a statement).
R 2014 3 · gr (Art. 16 ff. VRG)
Administrative Court Upholds Rezoning from Resort to Hotel Zone Over Property Owner's Objection
Cited as the cantonal basis for the principle of the right to be heard.
R 2013 171 · gr (Art. 16 ff. VRG)
Municipal Order Annulled Due to Violation of Right to Be Heard in Building Restoration Case
Although cited extensively in the reasoning regarding procedural rights, this provision is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive).