370.100
VRGLGA
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 15 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Vertretung
Allgemeine Grundsätze des Verfahrens - Rechte und Pflichten der Beteiligten
Art. 15 VRG · Vertretung
1. Die Beteiligten können sich durch eine handlungsfähige Person vertreten lassen
a) in Verfahren vor Verwaltungsbehörden;
b) in Steuer- und Sozialversicherungsstreitsachen;
c) in anderen Verfahren vor richterlichen Behörden mit Genehmigung der oder des Vorsitzenden auf begründetes Gesuch im Einzelfall.
2. Die Rechtsvertretung durch eine Person, die im kantonalen Anwaltsregister eingetragen ist oder Freizügigkeit nach dem BGFA geniesst, ist in allen Verfahren möglich.
3. Die Vertreterin oder der Vertreter hat sich auf Verlangen der Behörde durch schriftliche Vollmacht über ihre Vertretungsbefugnis auszuweisen.
Gerichtsentscheide zu dieser Bestimmung (23)
VR1 2024 93 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 2 und Abs. 3 KGÖ i.V.m. Art. 73 Abs. 1 sowie Art. 75 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 VRG)
Cantonal Infrastructure Department v. Journalist (Settlement Agreement Disclosure)
Cited for the imposition of court costs on the defendant authority in order 2.
U 2023 65 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Mother v. Social Integration Requirement Due to Health and Family Burden
Cited in the context of determining the admissibility of the representative (Beistand) to act in court.
U 2023 36 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Professor's Procedural Appeal Against Denial of Representation Authority Dismissed
The court rejected the appeal because the decision below correctly denied the request for authorization to represent based on this provision.
U 2020 46 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Administrative Appeal Dismissed as Moot Following Suspension of Employment Program Obligation
This article governed the decision to reject the request for an exception permit for legal representation.
U 2020 92 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Unauthorized Representation
The court explicitly denied the request for an exception to representation based on this article, which is the main ground for not admitting the appeal.
U 2020 46 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Appeal Against Compulsory Work Program for Social Assistance Recipient During COVID-19 Pandemic
The request for an exceptional authorization for B._____ to represent the appellant was denied under this provision.
U 2020 92 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Unauthorized Representation Bars Appeal of Social Assistance Termination
The court denied the application for an exception to allow non-lawyer representation due to the professional nature of the representation.
S 2020 87 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Claimant v. Insurer Regarding Termination of Accident Insurance Benefits
Cited regarding the admissibility of representation by the spouse.
S 2020 87 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Appeal of Denied Benefits Overturned Due to Insufficient Medical Reasoning
Cited in conjunction with Art. 61 ATSG to confirm the admissibility of representation by the spouse.
S 2019 28 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Denial of Increased Disability Pension and Integrity Compensation for Industrial Accident Sequelae Upheld
Cited regarding the admissibility of the representation.
U 2019 54 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Social Assistance and De Facto Cohabitation Ruling
This provision was cited to grant the request for legal representation in this specific case.
V 2017 5 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Unauthorized Representative and Procedural Defect
The court dismissed the application for an exception permit (Ausnahmebewilligung) based on this article, as the representative was deemed to be acting professionally.
V 2017 5 · gr (Art. 15 VRG)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Unauthorized Representative and Procedural Defect
The representative's authorization to act (Postulationsfähigkeit) was assessed based on this procedural rule.
V 2017 5 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Cantonal Electoral District Challenge Dismissed on Procedural Grounds and Lack of Jurisdiction
Cited extensively as the basis for allowing or denying the request for exceptional authorization for legal representation.
V 2017 5 · gr (Art. 15 Abs. 2 VRG)
Cantonal Electoral District Challenge Dismissed on Procedural Grounds and Lack of Jurisdiction
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the prerequisites for legal representation (registration or freedom of establishment).