Art. 1 Gesetz über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG) - Kantonale Behörden

VR1 2024 92 · gr (Art. 1 Abs. 2 VRG)

Municipality Violated Procurement Rules by Altering Price Evaluation in Zoning Contract Award

Cited in the reasoning section (E. 1.3) in conjunction with Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB to confirm that the appeal was admissible.

VR3 2024 12 · gr (Art. 73 Art. 1 VRG)

Developer Costs for Archaeological Excavations Not Compensable

Applied to impose court costs on the unsuccessful appellant.

R 2024 31 · gr (Art. 1 VRG)

Municipal Denial of Retroactive Building Permit for Basement Habitation Upheld

Cited in order 2 as part of the calculation of the total court costs.

U 2023 59 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Art. 7 ff. und Art. 39 Abs. 1 VRG sowie Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 38 VRG)

Road Surfacing Procurement Cancellation Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness and formal correctness of the appeal.

R 2023 57 · gr (Art. 73 Art. 1 VRG)

Solar Panel Ground Installation Denial Upheld Due to Building-First Policy

Provision cited for imposing the costs of the procedure on the unsuccessful appellant.

U 2020 92 · gr (Art. 1 Nr. 1 VRG)

Appeal Dismissed Due to Unauthorized Representation

This article is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-4, but as the decision is based on non-admission, this is the likely procedural basis for the entire process, however, based strictly on the rule to only include articles cited in the dispositive orders, none of the procedural grounds mentioned in section II (like Art. 38 VRG or Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG) are explicitly repeated in the final orders 1-4.

R 2020 68 · gr (Art. 1 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Building Permit Appeal Moot Due to Developer's Renunciation

The VRG is the general procedural law governing the administrative review; its articles are implicitly used for the procedural orders (2.).

U 2020 71 · gr (Art. 1 des Entscheids (Art. 53 Abs. 2 VRG))

Property Owners' Access Rights and Suspension of Traffic Restriction

The procedural appeal was upheld and the suspension of effect (aufschiebende Wirkung) for the main appeal was granted based on this provision.

U 2019 37 · gr (Art. 1 lit. a VRG)

Appeal Against Mandatory Change of Permanent Residence

This article is not present, but Art. 49 Abs. 1 lit. a VRG was cited as the basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

A 2017 49 · gr (Art. 1 des VRG)

Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Deductibility of Barn Renovation Costs

The reference to the VRG (Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act) is implicitly cited through the application of its articles (Art. 43, 49, 50, 73, 78).

U 2014 47 · gr (Art. 1 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG))

Seizure of Vehicle Registration Due to Lapsed Insurance Upheld

Mentioned in the context of the cost ruling, although Art. 73 Abs. 1 VRG is the direct basis for imposing costs.

A 2012 55 · gr (Art. 1. VRG)

Municipal Levy on Property Expansion vs. Renovation

This is likely a typographical error in the original document, as the costs were imposed based on Art. 73 Abs. 1 VRG, but since the dispositive lists the final order, 'Art. 73 Abs. 1 VRG' is the primary applicable cost provision, and the order does not explicitly cite 'Art. 1. VRG' for costs or ruling.

R 2011 109 · gr (Art. 1. Hauptsatz VRG)

Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Height and Aesthetic Conformity Upheld

This article was applied to impose costs on the losing party, specifically concerning compensation.

R 2011 109 · gr (Art. 1. Hauptsatz VRG)

Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Height and Aesthetic Conformity Upheld

This article was applied when addressing the final costs awarded against the appellant.

R 2011 109 · gr (Art. 1. Hauptsatz VRG)

Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Height and Aesthetic Conformity Upheld

This article was applied when determining the compensation payable to the winning party.